Objective
Various combinations of hemogram parameters such as white blood cell (WBC), neutrophil (NEU), lymphocyte (LYM), platelet (PLT), neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), mean platelet volume (MPV), and platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) are used as inflammatory markers. In this study, we aimed to determine the potential role of hemogram count parameters in predicting preterm birth.
Methods
The study included 212 singleton pregnant women aged 17-40 years who were diagnosed with preterm labor and had preterm delivery and whose gestational weeks were between 24 weeks and 36 weeks and 6 days. The control group included 120 pregnant women between the ages of 17 and 40 who were delivered at 37 weeks or later and had no obstetric complications were included. The preterm labor group was divided into 2 subgroups: early preterm (n:108) and late preterm (n:104). Inflammatory markers were compared separately for the 1st and 3rd trimesters among the study groups. Changes between the 1st and 3rd trimester values were also assessed.
Results
When the 1st trimester and 3rd trimester hemogram parameters were analyzed, in the preterm group, WBC, NEU and NLR values were found to be increased and MPV value decreased. A statistically significant difference was found between WBC, NEU, MPV and NLR values (p<0.05). In the term group only the increase in MPV was statistically significant. Markers for prediction of preterm birth cut-off levels as in 1st trimester WBC >9450/mm3, NEU >6650/mm3, NLR >3.86, MPV <9050/mm3 and in thirt trimester WBC >11300/mm3, NEU >8350/mm3, NLR >4.69, MPV <9250/mm3.
Conclusion
In our study we have found that 1st and 3rd trimester hemogram parametes as WBC, NEU, MPV and NLR varies among term and preterm birth and could be useful as proinflammatory markers. More comprehensive studies in different populations are needed to apply the results of our study to clinical practice.
Keywords
Preterm Labor, neutrophil, lymphocyte, neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio
Introduction
Preterm labor is defined as labor occurring before the 37th gestational week. Early preterm birth occurs before 34 weeks of gestation, and late preterm birth occurs between 34 and 37 weeks of gestation.[1] Preterm birth is the most common cause of mortality and morbidity in infants and children under 5 years of age worldwide.[2] Preterm infants are also at risk for acute and chronic respiratory, infectious, metabolic and neurological problems. Mortality and morbidity have been observed to be higher in babies born in the early preterm period compared to babies born in the late preterm period.[3] Therefore, the prediction of preterm labor and prevention of preterm delivery is important in terms of reducing fetal mortality and morbidity.
Preterm labor's pathogenesis is not well understood. Intrauterine infection, uterine ischemia, abnormal uterine contraction, abnormal immunogenic sensitization, cervical pathologies, and endocrine disorders are among the etiological causes.[4] The resulting tissue damage, infection, immunologic reactions, and inflammatory process cause a systematic response in pregnant women, which can be acute or chronic.[5] The association of inflammation and infection is the most thought pathologic process whose molecular pathophysiology has been defined among the causes of preterm labor.[6] Of the preterm deliveries, 80% of them are caused by spontaneous preterm labor and preterm premature rupture of membranes.[7] The remaining 20% are maternal and fetal pathologies.[8]
Maternal intraamniotic infection with a subclinical course is common in 25% of babies delivered as a result of preterm labor.[9] Predicting and preventing preterm labor is critical for both fetal and maternal health. In this study, we attempted to determine the role of inflammatory markers obtained from 1st and 3rd trimester hemogram examination in the prediction of preterm labor and to identify potential risk factors.Methods
Patients who applied to Tepecik Education and Research Hospital, Gynecology and Obstetrics Clinic between 2017 and 2023 were evaluated retrospectively. The study included 212 pregnant women aged 17 to 40 years old who had been diagnosed with preterm labor and preterm delivery and whose gestational weeks ranged from 24 to 36 weeks and 6 days according to the last menstrual period (LMP). The control group included 120 pregnant women in the same age group with no obstetric pathology and a gestational age of 37 weeks or more according to LMP. The preterm labor group was divided into two subgroups: early preterm (n:108) and late preterm (n:104). Pregnant women with gestational hypertension, gestational diabetes, thyroid disorders, hematologic disorders, hyperemesis gravidarum, active infection, a history of preterm labor, or multiple pregnancies were excluded. The data of 332 pregnant women were accessed via the analysis of the hospital database.
Age, gravida, gestational week, race, mode of delivery, 1st and 3rd trimester white blood cell (WBC), lymphocyte (LYM), platelet (PLT), neutrophil (NEU), mean platelet volume (MPV) values, postnatal 1st minute and 5th minute APGAR scores, infant height, weight and sex were recorded. The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) were calculated from hemogram parameters in the 1st and 3rd trimesters.
The data were analyzed using IBM Statistics version 21.0. The t-test was used for categorical variables. Shapiro-Wilk test was performed to determine the distribution of quantitative data. The variables meeting the normality criteria were evaluated using ANOVA, and the variables that deviated from the normal distribution were evaluated using the Kruskal-Wallis test. Evaluations with p>0.05 were considered statistically significant.Results
Our study included 332 pregnant women who had given birth. The mean age was 27.7±6.49 years, while the average parity was 2.32±1.165. It was found that the deliveries occurred as follows: 108 (32.5%) as preterm deliveries, 104 (31.3%) as late preterm deliveries, and 120 (36.1%) as term deliveries. Cesarean sections were performed in 78 (72.2%) preterm deliveries, 72 (69.2%) late preterm deliveries, and 82 (68%) term deliveries. When demographic data were analyzed, it was discovered that the preterm group had a higher age, gravida, and parity, but there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (Table 1).
When the 1st trimester hemogram parameters were analyzed, in the preterm group, WBC, NEU and NLR values were found to be increased and MPV value decreased. A statistically significant difference was found between WBC, NEU, MPV and NLR values (p<0.05). In the term group only the increase in MPV was statistically significant. Table 2 shows the 1st-trimester hemogram parameters of the pregnant women who participated in the study.
When the 3rd trimester hemogram parameters of term and preterm pregnant women were compared, WBC, NEU, and NLR values were found to be higher in the preterm group. The increased WBC, NEU, and NLR levels were statistically significant (p<0.05). In the term group only MPV elevation was statistically significant. The 3rd trimester hemogram parameters of the pregnant women who participated in the study are summarized in Table 3.
In the comparison of statistically significant parameters, WBC and NLR values decreased significantly in the term group in terms of 1st trimester comparisons. MPV values were found to be significantly increased compared to the other groups. In the preterm group, no statistically significant difference was observed between the early and late preterm groups. 1st-trimester hemogram parameters of the sub-groups of preterm pregnant women who participated in the study are shown in Table 4.
WBC and NLR values were found to be significantly lower in the term group in the third trimester in terms of the comparison of the statistically significant parameters. In the preterm group, MPV values were found to be significantly increased compared to the term group. In the preterm group, no statistically significant difference was observed between the early and late preterm groups (Table 5). When the groups were compared, the term group had significantly higher neonatal weight and 1st and 5th minute APGAR scores than the late-preterm and early-preterm groups (Table 6).
When the perinatal outcomes were analyzed based on the gestational week, neonatal weight, and 1st and 5th minute APGAR scores were found to be statistically significantly higher in the term group. When the groups were compared among themselves, neonatal weight, and 1st and 5th-minute APGAR scores were found to be statistically significantly higher in the term group compared to the late preterm and early preterm groups (Table 6).
We’ve found that in our study, markers for prediction of preterm birth cut-off levels as in 1st trimester WBC >9450/mm3, NEU >6650/mm3, NLR >3.86, MPV <9050/mm3 and in 3rd trimester WBC >11300/mm3, NEU >8350/mm3, NLR >4.69, MPV <9250/mm3.Discussion
Hemogram parameters are a simple, low-cost test that can be easily performed in many healthcare centers nowadays. During pregnancy, hemogram evaluation is important in determining the inflammatory process for many pathologic conditions. We compared the 1st and 3rd trimester hemogram parameters of term and women who had given preterm birth in this study. An increase in WBC, NEU, and NLR parameters, as well as a decrease in MPV, were found to be associated with preterm labor when 1st and 3rd trimester hemogram parameters were evaluated.
Elevated WBC is a common finding of acute infection and inflammation.[10] Physiologic leukocytosis during pregnancy, as well as appendicitis, cholecystitis, cystitis, and other inflammatory processes, are more common in inflammatory processes.[11] WBC elevation was reported to be a marker that could be used to predict preterm delivery in a study conducted by Liyin et al. with 400 pregnant women.[12] The findings in this study were linked to histologic chorioamnionitis. Karen et al. reported that in a study of 218 pregnant women, WBC elevation could be used to predict preterm delivery in symptomatic women (p:0.001).[13] Births before 28 weeks of gestation were associated with subclinical infections, while births after 28 weeks were associated with maternal and/or fetal hypothalamic pituitary adrenal axis. In our study, the increase in WBC in the 1st and 3rd trimesters was found to be statistically significant in pregnant women with preterm delivery (p:0.001).
It has been shown that platelet activation and inflammation-related processes may also play a role in decreased MPV levels during preterm labor. During pregnancy, many subjects, such as ectopic pregnancy, preeclampsia, and cholestasis have been studied.[14, 15] Yurtçu et al. found no statistically significant difference between 1st and 3rd trimester MPV values in a similar study with 1049 pregnant women.[16] This study does not coincide with the results of our study. MPV was found to be a reliable predictor of preterm delivery in a study by Ma et al.[17] The MPV cut-off value was determined to be 10 f/L. The difference between this study and ours is that the mean of all groups was 10 f/L. A statistically significant decrease in MPV levels was found in pregnant women with preterm delivery in the study of Aktün et al. with 270 pregnant women.[18] In our study, the decrease in MPV in the 1st and 3rd trimesters was statistically significant in pregnant women with preterm delivery, which is similar to the study by Aktün et al. (p<0.001).
Elevated NEU is used as a marker of acute infection and inflammation together with WBC.[19] NEU assessment was also performed in studies related to inflammation in which other hemogram parameters were evaluated in pregnancy.[14, 15] In a study conducted by Tolunay et al. with 92 pregnant women, pregnant women between 24-34 weeks who were at risk in terms of preterm labor were evaluated. The results of this study revealed that the increase in NEU in pregnant women who gave birth within one week was found to be increased compared to pregnant women who gave birth after one week.[20] In a study conducted by Zhang et al. on 175 pregnant women, hemogram parameters of pregnant women who had preterm birth and healthy pregnant women were compared.[21] No statistically significant difference was found between the groups in terms of the NEU. In our study, the increase in NEU in the 1st and 3rd trimesters was found to be statistically significant in pregnant women with preterm delivery (p:0.001).
Existing studies have shown that the NLR is an inflammatory biochemical marker and that an increase in it is associated with poor obstetric outcomes.[22-24] Although an inverse correlation between increased NLR and preterm birth and low birth weight was detected in the study by Akgün et al., no statistically significant difference was found.[25] In a study conducted with 78 pregnant women, Yüce et al. divided the pregnant women at risk of preterm delivery into two groups those who gave birth within one week and those who did not. It was observed that NLR increased statistically significantly in the group of pregnant women who delivered within one week.[26] In our study, in terms of NLR results, 1st and 3rd trimester NLR increase was statistically significant in pregnant women with preterm labor (1st trimester p:0.001, 3rd trimester p:0.01).
Limitations
The retrospective design of our study is a limitation. CBC test which is a non-invasive test are strength for our study.Conclusion
In our study we have found that 1st and 3rd trimester hemogram parametes as WBC, NEU, MPV and NLR varies among term and preterm birth and could be useful as pro-inflammatory markers. More comprehensive studies in different populations are needed to apply the results of our study to clinical practice.
1. Goldenberg RL, Culhane JF, Iams JD, Romero R: Epidemiology and causes of preterm birth, The Lancet 2008, 371:75-84
2. Tucker J, McGuire W: Epidemiology of preterm birth, Bmj 2004, 329:675-678
3. Platt M: Outcomes in preterm infants, Public health 2014, 128:399-403
4. Romero R, Espinoza J, Gonçalves LF, Kusanovic JP, Friel LA, Nien JK: Inflammation in preterm and term labour and delivery. Edited by Elsevier, 2006, p. pp. 317-326
5. Baumann H, Gauldie J: The acute phase response, Immunology today 1994, 15:74-80
6. Romero R, Dey SK, Fisher SJ: Preterm labor: one syndrome, many causes, Science 2014, 345:760-765
7. Saygı A, Keskin U, Kıncı MF, Ulubay M, Karaşahin KE, Yenen MC: Successful treatment of preterm premature rupture of membranes, Çukurova Medical Journal 2016, 41:130-131
8. PJ M: The preterm prediction study: risk factors for indicated preterm births, Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998, 178:562-567
9. Conde‐Agudelo A, Papageorghiou A, Kennedy S, Villar J: Novel biomarkers for the prediction of the spontaneous preterm birth phenotype: a systematic review and meta‐analysis, BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology 2011, 118:1042-1054
10. Dockree S, Shine B, Pavord S, Impey L, Vatish M: White blood cells in pregnancy: reference intervals for before and after delivery, EBioMedicine 2021, 74:
11. Çınar H, Aygün A, Derebey M, Tarım İA, Akalın Ç, Büyükakıncak S, Erzurumlu K: Significance of hemogram on diagnosis of acute appendicitis during pregnancy, Turkish Journal of Trauma & Emergency Surgery/Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi 2018, 24:
12. Qiu L, Pan M, Zhang R, Ren K: Maternal peripheral blood platelet‐to‐white blood cell ratio and platelet count as potential diagnostic markers of histological chorioamnionitis‐related spontaneous preterm birth, Journal of clinical laboratory analysis 2019, 33:e22840
13. Campbell MK, Challis JR, DaSilva O, Bocking AD: A cohort study found that white blood cell count and endocrine markers predicted preterm birth in symptomatic women, Journal of clinical Epidemiology 2005, 58:304-310
14. Yayla Abide C, Vural F, Kılıççı Ç, Bostancı Ergen E, Yenidede İ, Eser A, Pekin O: Can We Predict Severity of Intrahepatic Cholestasis of Pregnancy via Using Inflammatory Markers?, 2017,
15. Ulkumen BA, Pala HG, Calik E, Koltan SO: Can mean platelet volume and platelet distrubition width be possible markers for ectopic pregnancy and tubal rupture?(MPV and PDW in ectopic pregnancy), Pakistan journal of medical sciences 2014, 30:352
16. YURTÇU E, ÖZKUL H, TOKGÖZ VY, KEYİF B: Comparison of first and third trimester complete blood count parameters for prediction of preterm birth, Jinekoloji-Obstetrik ve Neonatoloji Tıp Dergisi 2023, 20:1833-1839
17. Ma M, Zhu M, Zhuo B, Li L, Chen H, Xu L, Wu Z, Cheng F, Xu L, Yan J: Use of complete blood count for predicting preterm birth in asymptomatic pregnant women: A propensity score‐matched analysis, Journal of clinical laboratory analysis 2020, 34:e23313
18. Aktün LH: Preterm eylemde erken prognostik faktör olarak trombositlerin rolü, Medeniyet Medical Journal 2017,
19. Babker AM, Di Elnaim EO: Hematological changes during all trimesters in normal pregnancy, Journal of Drug Delivery and Therapeutics 2020, 10:1-4
20. Tolunay HE, Elci E: Importance of haemogram parameters for prediction of the time of birth in women diagnosed with threatened preterm labour, Journal of international medical research 2020, 48:
0300060520918432
21. Zhang Y, Zhen M, Zeng Y, Lao L, Ai W: Complete blood count during the first trimester predicting spontaneous preterm birth, European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences 2022, 26:
5489-5495
22. Christoforaki V, Zafeiriou Z, Daskalakis G, Katasos T, Siristatidis C: First trimester neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and pregnancy outcome, Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2020, 40:59-64
23. Hershko Klement A, Hadi E, Asali A, Shavit T, Wiser A, Haikin E, Barkan Y, Biron-Shental T, Zer A, Gadot Y: Neutrophils to lymphocytes ratio and platelets to lymphocytes ratio in pregnancy: A population study, PloS one 2018, 13:e0196706
24. Elmas B, Kinci MF, Gök İE, Alkan A, Toğrul C, Sarikaya E: Is higher IgE levels in preeclamptic pregnancies suggest autoimmune pathophysiology?, Çukurova Medical Journal 2019, 44:547-554
25. Akgun N, Namli Kalem M, Yuce E, Kalem Z, Aktas H: Correlations of maternal neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR) with birth weight, The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine 2017, 30:2086-2091
26. Yuce E: Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR) and Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (PLR) Can Predict Spontaneous Preterm Birth?, Journal of Inflammation Research 2023,
2423-2429
|
File/Dsecription |
|
Table 1 Demographic data of pregnant women who had term and preterm deliveries |
|
Table 2 1st-trimester hemogram parameters |
|
Table 3 3rd-trimester hemogram parameters |
|
Table 4 Comparison of 1st-trimester hemogram parameters of pregnant women with early preterm and late preterm labor |
|
Table 5 Comparison of 3rd-trimester hemogram parameters of pregnant women with early preterm and late preterm labor |
|
Table 6 Perinatal results according to weeks of birth |
|
reviewed version corrected version |
|
respond to reviewer 2 respond |