Questionnaire on mouth and dental health during pregnancy: myths and facts. Perinatal Journal 2015;23(4):180–185
- İstanbul Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Endodonti Anabilim Dalı, İstanbul
- Kanuni Sultan Süleyman Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Perinatoloji Kliniği, İstanbul
- Kanuni Sultan Süleyman Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Kadın Hastalıkları ve Doğum Kliniği, İstanbul
Ali Ekiz, Kanuni Sultan Süleyman Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Perinatoloji Kliniği, İstanbul, [email protected]
Manuscript Received: September 16, 2015
Manuscript Accepted: November 10, 2015
Earlyview Date: November 10, 2015
Conflicts of Interest
Conflicts of Interest: No conflicts declared.
The aim of the study is to assess the opinions of gynecologists and obstetrics in Turkey about oral hygiene, odontotherapy, periodontal diseases and their perinatal impacts during pregnancy.
A questionnaire consisting of 20 closed-ended questions was prepared for gynecologists and obstetricians, and 217 gynecologists and obstetricians from various hospitals in Turkey who accepted to participate in the questionnaire were included in the study. The questionnaire was applied in a standard way to the participants and the names of some participants were not revealed upon their requests.
According to the data obtained from the study, 90.8% of the participants believed that the pregnancy increased gingival inflammation. Similarly, a large number of physicians (79.3%) stated that there was a relationship between prenatal outcomes and oral and dental health. Most of the participants believed that dental scaling (86.6%), dental extraction (81.6%), filling (82.6%) and periapical radiography (80.2%) practices are safe, and the rates of trust in root canal treatment and panoramic radiography were 64.5% and 53.5%, respectively. While 73.3% of the participants recommended dental check-up before pregnancy to their patients who were planning pregnancy, 36.1% of the participants recommended dental check-up to their pregnant patients in the first prenatal visit.
Gynecologists and obstetricians should have more confidence that both diagnostic and therapeutical procedures in the dentistry are safe during pregnancy, and should inform the patients they follow up properly. It should be kept in mind that having a good oral health before pregnancy and also to maintain it during the pregnancy will have a positive impact on gestational outcomes.
Pregnancy, oral hygiene, periodontal disease, dental treatment, gestational outcomes.
Complex physiological and hormonal changes occur during pregnancy which is a unique period in the life of women. Estrogen and progesterone hormones increasing during pregnancy cause the increase of gingival vascularization and the suppression of immune response. Many physiological changes occur during the adaptation of body to the pregnancy. In terms of the oral changes, it is seen that salivation and pH level do not change during pregnancy. It was also shown that some microorganism species (Prevotella) increase in the mouth. These increasing microorganisms increase the possibility of gingival bleeding and cause gingival inflammation to worsen; however, there is no finding to assert that pregnancy cause or accelerate tooth decay.[1,3]
During pregnancy, various diseases and lesions may occur in the mouth. Benign gingival lesions which are also known as pyogenic granuloma or gestational epulis are seen in approximately 5% of the pregnancies. Ptyalism is a rare complication characterized by nausea and loss of saliva in a significant amount such as 1–2 l/day. In the gestational gingivitis, gingivae are hyperectemic and become very sensitive to bleed even during tooth brushing. Gestational gingivitis typically recovers during postpartum period. Gestational gingivitis and periodontitis are the most common oral diseases observed during pregnancy.
There are some studies reporting that the presence of maternal periodontitis is a risk factor for preterm labor and low birth weight.[7,8] In this sense, both dentists and obstetricians should have current knowledge on oral hygiene, oral diseases and treatments during standard prenatal care of pregnant women and they also should show the ultimate attention.
In this study, we aimed to assess the opinions of obstetricians through a questionnaire on oral hygiene, oral treatments and their impacts on perinatal outcomes in frequently encountered cases during daily practices of dentistry.
A total of 217 volunteer gynecologists and obstetricians from various hospitals in Turkey were included in this cross-sectional questionnaire study. The questionnaire including 20 closed-ended questions were applied to the participants as a standard and names of some participants were not revealed upon their requests.
In the first part, there were questions evaluating the demographic information of the physicians including name (optional), age, sex, expertise period, the institution they work and their expertise field. In the second part, the questions “Do you believe that pregnancy increases the possibility of gingival inflammation?”, “Do you believe that there is a relationship between oral and dental health and perinatal outcomes?” and “Do you believe that periodontal diseases can cause preterm labor and/or deliveries with low birth weight?” were asked to the physicians.
In the third part, the question “Among dental scaling, dental extraction, filling, root canal treatment, periapical radiography and panoramic radiography, which one(s) do you believe to be safe during pregnancy?” was asked. The fourth and last part included following questions:
• “Do you recommend dental check-up before pregnancy to your patients who were planning pregnancy?”
• “Do you recommend dental check-up to your pregnant patients in the first prenatal visit?”
• “Do you recommend your pregnant patients to postpone their dental check-up to postpartum period?”
• “Do you believe that it is safe to use local anesthetics including vasoconstrictor during pregnancy?”
• “Which trimester do you believe is the safest period for dental treatments during pregnancy?”
The participants were informed about the aim and the content of the study first, and then they were included in the study on a volunteer basis. The study was initiated with the decision of the ethics committee of the related hospital (no. 9322, dated 2015/2).
All questionnaire forms received from the participants were coded and analyzed in the electronic environment. The responses obtained were evaluated by descriptive statistics (frequency, percentage, and mean±standard deviation). The difference among the groups was assessed by chi-square test at p<0.05 significance level.
A majority of 217 gynecologists and obstetricians who participated in the study were between 31- and 40-year-old (56.3%), working at the training and research hospital of the ministry of health (62.2%) and had a professional expertise between 0 and 10 years (65%). Thirteen participants had sub-branch expertise on Perinatology and 6 of them had sub-branch expertise on Gynecological Oncology. A majority of the participants were in the age group of 31–40 (56.3%) and 50.7% of the participants were women. Male-female ratio among the participants was similar. Those who accepted to participate in the study answered all the questions in the questionnaire. The demographic characteristics of the participants are shown in the Table 1.
In the second part of the questionnaire, participants were asked questions assessing the relationship between perinatal outcomes and oral health and diseases. According to the data obtained from the study, 90.8% of the participants believed that the pregnancy increased gingival inflammation. Similarly, a large number of physicians (79.3%) stated that there was a relationship between prenatal outcomes and oral and dental health. For the question if the presence of periodontal diseases could be a risk factor for preterm labor and/or delivery with low birth weight, 78.8% of the participants replied that it could be risk factor.
The third part of the questionnaire includes questions about the reliability of diagnosis and treatment methods used frequently in the daily dentistry practices in terms of pregnancy. Most of the participants believed that dental scaling (86.6%), dental extraction (81.6%), filling (82.6%) and periapical radiography (80.2%) practices are safe, the rates of trust in root canal treatment and panoramic radiography were 64.5% and 53.5%, respectively (Fig. 1). The difference between these two groups was statistically significant (p<0.001, chi-square test).
In the fourth and last part of the questionnaire, the participants were asked questions about their recommendations on dental check-ups during pregnancy, on local anesthetics and on the safest trimester for procedures. While 73.3% of the participants recommended dental check-up before pregnancy to their patients who were planning pregnancy, 36.1% of the participants recommended dental check-up to their pregnant patients in the first prenatal visit. Almost all of the participants (90.3%) agreed that dental check-up should not be postponed during pregnancy. The results of the study showed that the participants had suspicions on the reliability of using local anesthetics including vasoconstrictor during pregnancy. Only 65% of the participants thought that they are safe. Finally, 68.7% of the participants stated that the second trimester is safer for dental treatments during pregnancy while 23% of them considered third trimester is safer. The questions and the analysis of responses for the fourth part of the questionnaire are shown in Table 2.
The participants were regrouped according to their sex (male: 105; female: 109) and the responses were reanalyzed. While 87.6% (92/105) of the male physicians replied negatively to the question for postponing dental check-up to the postpartum period, 95.4% (104/109) of the female physicians replied negatively to the same question, and this difference was found to be statistically significant (p<0.05). No significant difference was found among the responses for other questions.
It was shown that the number of some oral microorganisms increases with the impact of steroid hormones increasing during pregnancy.[2,7] Due to these increasing microorganisms, the tendency of gingiva to bleed increases and may cause severe inflammation even on low plaque levels. Considering the responses of the participants, it is seen that almost all of them (90.8%) stated the increase of gingival inflammation during pregnancy. In the studies carried out on this matter, it was reported that the presence of maternal periodontitis is a risk factor for preterm labor and low birth weight, and therefore perinatal outcomes may be worsened.[8,9] Since preterm labor and the complications developing secondary to preterm labor are among the leading factors responsible for newborn morbidity and mortality, this matter is of vital importance. Also, periodontal diseases in various forms were found in about 40% of pregnant women. There are also other studies not asserting that the presence of periodontal diseases increases poor perinatal outcomes.[11,12] In the study of Agueda et al. it was reported that the relationship between periodontal diseases and perinatal outcomes is controversial.
In the literature review of Shah et al., it was concluded that periodontal disease treatment during pregnancy improved perinatal outcomes in terms of preterm labor and delivery with low birth weight. On the contrary, Michalowicz et al. reported that the rates of preterm labor, low birth weight and growth retardation did not change with periodontal treatment. Although it is not fully clarified in the current literature, the presence of periodontal disease is considered as a risk factor for preterm labor and low birth weight, but it is also thought that the treatment carried out during pregnancy do not affect the outcomes significantly. According to the analysis of the questions on this matter, 79.3% of the participants believe that there is a relationship between perinatal outcomes and oral and dental health while almost same rate of the participants (78.8%) believe that it may be associated with preterm labor and/or low birth weight. Although the relationship between periodontal disease and perinatal outcomes is controversial, regular oral care and dental check-up should be recommended all women who are pregnant and planning to be pregnant.
In the third part of the study, the participants were asked to respond to the questions for the reliability of diagnosis and treatment methods frequently used in daily dentistry practice. As it is understood that a majority of the participants agree as a result of the analysis of the results, dental scaling, dental extraction and filling procedures can be carried out safely during pregnancy. However, the concerns of physicians about the reliability of root canal treatment were reflected to the questionnaire results significantly. Almost one third (35.5%) of the participants reported that the root canal treatment during pregnancy is not safe. On the basis of these results, it was concluded that the female obstetricians should update their knowledge on root canal treatment.
Similarly, the concerns of physicians about panoramic radiography were found out from the questionnaire results. It was shown in the studies carried out on radiation exposure during pregnancy that there was no increase in the congenital anomalies in pregnant women who were exposed to X-ray exposure less than the dose of 5–10 cGy (1 Gy = 100 cGy).[16,17] Dental radiographic procedures covering entire mouth provides 0.0008 cGy radiation exposure. In periapical and panoramic radiographies, radiation exposure is one third of the exposure provided in full mouth radiographies. Diagnostic radiographies are significant examinations for the diagnosis and treatment of dental conditions and they are considered to be safe during pregnancy.[4,19–22]
The radiation dose in the radiographies used in dentistry is quite lower than the dose which is potentially harmful. FDA does not recommend making any change in the radiography use due to the pregnancy.[22,23] In the daily standard practice, the abdominal region and the neck of pregnant woman can be protected during procedure. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) reports that the diagnosis and treatment procedures including radiographies used for oral and dental pathologies and local anesthetics (with or without epinephrine) are safe to use during pregnancy. It was seen in the questionnaire results that almost half of the participants (46.5%) do not trust panoramic radiography and 19.8% of them do not trust periapical radiography, where this distrust is wrong. By increasing the knowledge of physicians on these matters, the concerns of patients can be resolved in daily practice and the procedures can be carried out more easily.
In the analysis of our questionnaire data, it was seen that 73.3% of the participants recommend their patients to have a dental check-up before pregnancy, only 36.1% of them recommended dental check-up during the first prenatal visit during pregnancy. Among the reasons for recommending dental check-up during first prenatal visit at such a low rate can be considered that the physicians do not have sufficient knowledge on this matter, have no chance due to the busy schedule or consider it as unimportant. In the 2013 statement of ACOG committee, it was stated that regular dental care is the key for good oral health and well-being. Since female obstetricians are those admitted most frequently among general healthcare professions, it is believed that this is a unique opportunity throughout the life of women to highlight the significance of good oral hygiene and dental care. ACOG recommends dental check-up regularly and at first prenatal visit.
The concern among physicians against local anesthetics is also another significant point of the study. Forty-five percent of the participants are against the use of local anesthetics during pregnancy. This rate inconsistent with scientific facts is remarkable. Use of local anesthetics at appropriate amounts and with proper techniques is safe during pregnancy.[4,21] According to FDA, the pregnancy category of local anesthetics (lidocaine %2, prilocaine) used by dentists during daily practices is B. The pregnancy category of mepivacaine %3, bupivacaine and articaine is C. These local anesthetics can be combined with vasoconstrictor agents. The pregnancy category of epinephrine used as a vasoconstrictor is B. Adding epinephrine to local anesthetics has the potential to decrease uteroplacental blood flow theoretically in case of intravascular injection. On the other hand, epinephrine in 1/100,000 concentration used dentistry is safe at the effective lowest dose with the proper technique.[21,25]
Traditionally, dental treatments are avoided during first trimester; however, there is no sufficient evidence on this matter. It should be remembered that any emergency dental treatment can be carried out regardless of the trimester. Wasylko et al. reported that the most ideal period for dental treatments is the beginning of the second trimester (14–20 weeks). According to the results of our study consistent with the literature, a majority of the participants (68.7%) reported that the most ideal period for treatments which cannot be postponed is the second trimester. Based on these data, all elective treatments planned to perform during pregnancy should be postponed to postpartum period.
Oral health is a significant part of general health and its significance increases during pregnancy. Routine checks for oral health should be maintained during pregnancy as before the pregnancy. The patients who do not have dental check-ups or have them irregularly should be directed to a dentist at the first prenatal visit. While postponing elective dental treatments to postpartum period, emergency dental treatments can be safely carried out during pregnancy. Although we did not have a wide population, the questionnaire results show that female obstetricians should update and improve their knowledge about oral and dental health. The patients should be informed that both diagnostic and treatment procedures are safe during pregnancy, and dentists and obstetricians should work on this matter in concordance with each other. It should be remembered that a good oral health may improve general health and affects gestational outcomes positively as well.
- Gordon MC. Maternal physiology. Gabbe SG, Niebyl JR, Simpson JL, Landon MB, Galan HL, Jauniaux ERM, et al., editors. In: Obstetrics. Normal and problem pregnancies. 6th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders Elsevier; 2012. p. 42–65.
- Alchalabi HA, Al Habashneh R, Jabali OA, Khader YS. Association between periodontal disease and adverse pregnancy outcomes in a cohort of pregnant women in Jordan. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol 2013;40:399–402. [PubMed]
- Cunningham FG, Leveno KJ, Bloom SL, Spong CY, Dashe JS, Hoffman BL, et al. Williams obstetrics. 24th ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Education; 2014. p. 184.
- ACOG Women’s Health Care Physicians, Committee on Health Care for Underserved Women. Committee Opinion No. 569: Oral health care during pregnancy and through the lifespan. Obstet Gynecol 2013;122:417–22. [PubMed] [CrossRef]
- Cunningham FG, Leveno KJ, Bloom SL, Spong CY, Dashe JS, Hoffman BL, et al. Williams obstetrics. 24th ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Education; 2014. p. 66.
- Gajendra S, Kumar JV. Oral health and pregnancy: a review. N Y State Dent J 2004;70:40–4. [PubMed]
- Baskaradoss JK, Geevarghese A, Al Dosari AA. Causes of adverse pregnancy outcomes and the role of maternal periodontal status – a review of the literature. Open Dent J 2012; 6:79–84. [PubMed] [CrossRef]
- Han YW. Oral health and adverse pregnancy outcomes – what's next? J Dent Res 2011;90:289–93. [PubMed] [CrossRef]
- Saddki N, Bachok N, Hussain NH, Zainudin SL, Sosroseno W. The association between maternal periodontitis and low birth weight infants among Malay women. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2008;36:296–304. [PubMed] [CrossRef]
- Lieff S, Boggess KA, Murtha AP, Jared H, Madianos PN, Moss K, et al. The oral conditions and pregnancy study: periodontal status of a cohort of pregnant women. J Periodontol 2004;75:116–26. [PubMed] [CrossRef]
- Srinivas SK, Sammel MD, Stamilio DM, Clothier B, Jeffcoat MK, Parry S, et al. Periodontal disease and adverse pregnancy outcomes: is there an association? Am J Obstet Gyn 2009:200;497.e491–8. [PubMed] [CrossRef]
- Santa Cruz I, Herrera D, Martin C, Herrero A, Sanz M. Association between periodontal status and pre-term and/or low-birth weight in Spain: clinical and microbiological parameters. J Periodontal Res 2013;48:443–51. [PubMed] [CrossRef]
- Agueda A, Echeverria A, Manau C. Association between periodontitis in pregnancy and preterm or low birth weight: review of the literature. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2008;13: E609–15. [PubMed]
- Shah M, Muley A, Muley P. Effect of nonsurgical periodontal therapy during gestation period on adverse pregnancy outcome: a systematic review. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2013;26:1691–5. [PubMed] [CrossRef]
- Michalowicz BS, Hodges JS, DiAngelis AJ, Lupo VR, Novak MJ, Ferguson JE, et al.; OPT Study. Treatment of periodontal disease and the risk of preterm birth. N Engl J Med 2006; 355:1885–94. [PubMed] [CrossRef]
- National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP). Recommendations on limits for exposure to ionizing radiation. NCRP report no. 91. Bethesda, MD: NCRP; 1987.
- Katz VL. Prenatal care. In: Scott JR, Gibbs RS, Karlan BY, Haney AF, editors. Danforth’s obstetrics and gynecology. 9th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins; 2003. p. 1–20.
- Freeman JP, Brand JW. Radiation doses of commonly used dental radiographic surveys. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1994;77:285–89. [PubMed]
- Matteson SR, Joseph LP, Bottomley W, Finger HW, Frommer HH, Koch RW, et al. The report of the panel to develop radiographic selection criteria for dental patients. Gen Dent 1991;39:264–70. [PubMed]
- Toppenberg KS, Hill DA, Miller DP. Safety of radiographic imaging during pregnancy. Am Fam Physician 1999;59:1813–8. [PubMed]
- Giglio JA, Lanni SM, Laskin DM, Giglio NW. Oral health care for the pregnant patient. J Can Dent Assoc 2009;75:43–8. [PubMed]
- American Dental Association Council on Scientific Affairs. The use of dental radiographs: update and recommendations. J Am Dent Assoc 2006;137:1304–12. [PubMed] [CrossRef]
- Gregory KD, Niebly JR, Johnson TRB. Preconception and prenatal care: part of the continuum. In: Gabbe SG, Niebyl JR, Simpson JL, Landon MB, Galan HL, Jauniaux ERM, et al., editors. Obstetrics. Normal and problem pregnancies. 6th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders Elsevier; 2012. p. 101–24.
- Amini H, Casimassimo PS. Prenatal dental care: a review. Gen Dent 2010;58:176–80. [PubMed]
- Little JW, Falace DA, Miller CS, Rhodus NL. Dental management of the medically compromised patient. 7th ed. St. Louis, MO: CV Mosby; 2008. p. 268–78, 456.
- Achtari MD, Georgakopoulou EA, Afentoulide N. Dental care throughout pregnancy: what a dentist must know. Oral Health Dent Manag 2012;11:169–76. [PubMed] [CrossRef]
- Cunningham FG, Gilstrap LC, Gant NF, Hauth JC, Leveno KJ, Wenstrom KD, et al. Williams obstetrics. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 2001. p. 107–29.
- Wasylko L, Matsui D, Dykxhoorn SM, Rieder MJ, Weinberg S. A review of common dental treatments during pregnancy: implications for patients and dental personnel. J Can Dent Assoc 1998;64:434–9. [PubMed]
The demographic data of the physicians who participated in the study.
The questions asked to the participants in the fourth part of the questionnaire and the analysis of the responses.
Opinions of the participants on the reliability of most common daily practices of dentistry (DC: dental scaling; DE: dental extraction; PA: periapical radiography; PR: panoramic radiography, RCT: root canal treatment).