Archive
Search

You can search published articles.

Journal Information

Online ISSN
1305-3124

Established
1993

Editors-in-Chief
​Cihat Şen, ​Nicola Volpe

Editors
Cecilia Villalain, Daniel Rolnik, M. Mar Gil

Managing Editors
Murat Yayla

Statistics Editor
Resul Arısoy

Nomogram of fetal nasal bone lenght at 11-13+6 gestational weeks in fetuses

Derya Sivri, Cem Dane, Banu Dane, Ahmet Çetin, Murat Yayla

Article info

Nomogram of fetal nasal bone lenght at 11-13+6 gestational weeks in fetuses. Perinatal Journal 2006;14(3):122-128

Author(s) Information

Derya Sivri,
Cem Dane,
Banu Dane,
Ahmet Çetin,
Murat Yayla

  1. Haseki Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi Kadın Hastalıkları ve Doğum Kliniği İstanbul TR
Publication History
Conflicts of Interest

No conflicts declared.

Objective
To obtain nomogram of fetal nasal bone length at 11-13+6. weeks gestation with known prognosis pregnancies. 
Methods
Nasal bone length of 394 choromosomal and structural normal fetuses at 11-13+6. weeks gestation were measured by transvaginal ultrasonography, prospectively. Crown-rump length (CRL), biparietal diameter (BPD), head circumference (HC), abdominal circumference (AC), femur leight (FL) were obtained in the meanwhile. The correlation between nasal bone and other biometric parameters was assessed by regression analysis and average ± SD of nasal bone lengths were measured at CRL 45-54, 55-64, 65-74, 75-84 mm
Results
A linear growth pattern was observed between nasal bone and fetal biometric parameters. The significant correlation were found between the nasal bone and biparietal diameter (BPD) (y=0.7843+0.0566xBPD, R= 0.4701, p<0.001), head circumference (HC) (y=0.5973+0.0177xHC, r= 0.5141, p<0.001), femoral bone length (FBL) (y=1.4028+0.0758xFL, r=0.4763, p<0.001), abdominal circumference (AC) (y=0.6802+0.0214xAC, r= 0.4919, p<0.001) and crown-rump length (CRL) (y=0.7561+0.0197xCRL, r= 0.489, p<0.001). Nasal bone length increased significantly with CRL from respective means of 1.75±0.30, 1.94 ±0.29, 2.11± 0.35 and 2.27±0.29 mm at 45-54, 55-64, 65-74 and 75-85 mm. 
Conclusion
Measurement of the nasal bone length at 11-13+6. weeks gestation shows a linear growth pattern according to other biometric parameters of fetuses. Nomogram of nasal bone length was performed for early detection of trisomy 21 and other chromosomal abnormalities at low risk population
Keywords

Nasal bone, 11-13+6. weeks, transvaginal ultrasonography, nomogram.

Introduction
It is determined that first ossification points were seen as CRL was 42 mm in radiographic and histological study in between 9th and 24th gestational weeks.1 Vomer bones first grow from functional matrix; while it seems as U shape in the beginning, it join together as gestation advances and becomes V shape. Nonexistence or hypoplasia of nasal bone in 11-13+6 weeks knows fetuses with increased risk by high activity for trisomy 21 and other trisomies. It was first reported in 2001 that nasal bone was not observed in 60-70% of fetuses with trisomy 21 in ultrasonography examination in 11-13+6 weeks.2 Normal lengths of hypoplastic nasal bones should be known in order to ascertain them. Evaluation of fetus nasal bone lengths by transvaginal ultrasonography as to gestational week and standard bone measurements in pregnancies continued and resulted normally and achieving growing nomogram for 11-13+6 gestational weeks are purposed in this work.
Methods
This work was arranged prospectively and done in 403 pregnants who applied to Gynecology Clinic of Training and Research Hospital in between 26th October 2004 – 29th October 2005. 403 fetuses having 45-84 mm CRL measurement are included to the study. Each patient was examined in 11th – 14th weeks by 7 mmHz vaginal transducer of Logic 400 Pro series (General Electric, U.S.A.) ultrasonography device by same gynecologist having the certificate of scanning. Biometric evaluation of fetus was done by CRL, BPD, HC, AC, FL measurements. Nasal bones were displayed in low brightness setting by about 45° angle in middle line and sagittal plan in which chin and lips of fetus were displayed within the area maxilla and frontal bone limit. Ultrasonography settings were adjusted as each calibration movement would be 0.1 mm. Required image was obtained for appropriate measurement by returning by means of setting of ultrasonography device. While ultrasonography probe was on neutral position of fetus, three different hyperechogenic lines parallel to nasal bone were observed. Ultrasonography settings were adjusted as it would disperse the image of bone edges minimally. Top limit of the bone was clearly seen individually from frontal bone. Upper line was observed as skin, more hyperechogenic lower line was observed as bone and line on the edge of nose was observed as part of skin (Figure1). It was especially paid attention not to mistake nasal bone with echogenic skin line of nose. Nasal bone was evaluated two times and recorded individually. Data were collected in computer. S.P.S.S. 11.5 program was used for statistical analyzes. r coefficients of data were calculated by analyzing data by means of Pearson correlation test. Linear regression analyze was done between nasal bone and other biometric parameters. Lower P value than 0.05 was taken as statistical significant limit. Normal and standard deviations of nasal bone were calculated while CR was 45-54, 55-64, 65-74, 75-84 mm.
Results
394 pregnants were found which suit to research criteria during study. Average gestation week was found as 12.40 ± 1.06. Average maternity age was 27.58 ± 5.69 and age interval was changing between 17 and 44. 3 of 403 fetuses had trisomy 21, 1 fetus had trisomy 18, 1 fetus was abortus in 12th week, 1 fetus had kyphoscoliosis, 1 fetus died as early birth in 26th week due to asymmetric intrauterine growing restriction, 1 fetus was discharged medically due to the fact that it was normal as karyotype but it had fetal anomaly and 1 fetus was discharged medically due to anencephaly and these 9 cases were not included to study while nomogram was being formed.Measurement was not done for 21 of 394 (5.3%) normal as chromosomally and structurally due to the fact that required position could not being obtained. Nasal bone measurements as to CRL were shown in Table 1. Nasal bone length of normal cases was increased linearly with CRL increase; a significant correlation between nasal bone length and CRL was found. When the regression analyze of relationship between nasal bone and CRL was done, regression equation was found as: y=0.7561 + 0.0197 x CRL, r=0.489, p<0.001 (Diagram 1). Also, statistically a significant correlation was found between nasal bone length and BDP, FL, AC and HC. When the regression analyze of relationship between nasal bone and BPD was done, regression equation was found as: y=0.7843 + 0.0566 x BPD, r=0.4701, p<0.001 (Diagram 2). When the regression analyze of relationship between nasal bone and HC was done, regression equation was found as: y=0.5973 + 0.0177 x HC, r=0.5141, p<0.001 (Diagram 3). When the regression analyze of relationship between nasal bone and AC was done, regression equation was found as: y=0.6802 + 0.0214 x AC, r=0.4919, p<0.001 (Diagram 4) and lastly when the regression analyze of relationship between nasal bone and FL was done, regression equation was found as: y=1.4028 + 0.0758 x FL, r=0.4764, p<0.001 (Diagram 5). 
Discussion
Ossification in nasal bones are being delayed in fetuses with trisomy.3, 4 Current studies maintains that Down syndrome and other chromosome anomalies should be scanned in the first trimester of gestation and various studies are done for that reason.5 For finding hypoplasia of nasal bone; good and on-time usage of ultrasonography is required together with knowing qualities of society and whether there is any deviation from universal norms or not. It is essentially required to have basic education about that subject, to do necessary measurements in normal groups, to evaluate them in terms of background and to control them continually before examinations to be done for that purpose.6 Current study was planned and carried on for one year in order to constitute data and nomograms belonging to our society during 11-13+6 week scanning done in our hospital.Nomograms are constituted by data belonging to our society and nasal bone measurements in 11-13+6 weeks discussed in world literature in recent years. Successful measurement rate with educated ultrasonographists for nasal bone was 90-99% in literature and our rate was 94% in our study, thus it was found similar to literature.3,4 The earliest fetus size measurement for seeing nasal bones was found as CRL 42 mm within examinations done after abortus.1 It was put forth that these bones could be measured beginning from 0.8 mm in 10th gestational week.7 Our lowest measurement value in our work was 1.0 mm in 11th gestational week. Average nasal bone length in our work at 11-13+6 weeks was lower than that Orlandi et al reported.4,8 When comparing the study of Cicero et al with the study of Cusick et al, it was found that average nasal bone lengths were similar.9,10 Possible explanation for different measurements may be technical differences. Nasal bone evaluation in 11-13+6 weeks is quite hard even for experienced people. Additionally, mistaking the skin on fetus nose with nasal bone by less experienced ultrasonographists is not a rare situation; it requires sufficient education and experience. Nasal bone is a structure which actually formed of two separate bones and only seen by ultrasonography after 10th gestational week.11 If it is not examined in an appropriate plan, it may be measured shorter or longer than normal or even it may be supposed that it does not exist.12,14 Quality of device, experience of applier, oligohydroamnios, obesity, fetus position and gestational week may affect the success of evaluation.15 Decreased ultrasonography resolution increases the dispersion and measurement becomes bigger. Doing our study as transvaginal helped us to obtain clearer image by preventing bone dispersion and to do more accurate measurement.
Conclusion
Nonexistence or hypoplasia of nasal bone in 11-13+6 weeks knows fetuses with increased risk by high activity for trisomy 21 and other trisomies. It is thought that nasal bone measurement may be done by experienced people for nearly all cases in these weeks. For that purpose, we constituted nasal bone nomogram belonging to normal fetuses chromosomally and morphologically in our society at first trimester and we presented for the purpose of ascertainment of nasal bone hypoplasia
References
1. Sandikcioglu M, Molsted K, Kjaer I. The Prenatal. Development of the Human Nasal and Vomeral Bones. J Craniofac Genet Dev Biol 1994; 14: 124-34.
2. Cicero S, Curcio P, Papageorghiou A, Sonek J, Nicolaides KH. Absence of nasal bone in fetüses with trisomy 21 at 11-14 weeks of gestation: an observational study. Lancet 2001; 358: 1665-7.
3. Cicero S, Longo D, Rembouskos G, Sacchini C, Nicolaides KH. Absent nasal bone at 11-14 weeks of gestation and chromosomal defects. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003; 22: 31-5.
4. Sonek D, Mckenna D, Webb D, Croom C, Nicolaides K. Nasal bone length throughout gestation: normal ranges based on 3537 fetal ultrasound measurements. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003; 21: 152-5.
5. Nicolaides KH. Nuchal translucency and other first-trimester sonographic markers of chromosomal abnormalities. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 191: 45-67.
6. Guis F, Ville Y, Vincent Y, Doumerc S, Pons JC, Frydman R. Ultrasound evaluation of the length of the fetal nasal bone throughout gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1995; 5: 304-7.
7. Malone FD, Ball RH, Nyberg DA, Comstock CH, Saade G, Berkowitz RL, Dugoff L, Craigo SD, Carr SR, Wolfe HM, Tripp T, D'Alton ME. FASTER Research Consortium. First-trimester nasal bone evaluation for aneuploidy in the general population. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 104: 1222-8.
8. Orlandi F, Bilardo CM, Campogrande M, Krantz D, Hallahan T, Rossi C, Viora E. Measurement of nasal bone length at 11-14 weeks of pregnancy and its potential role in Down syndrome risk assessment. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003; 22: 36-9.
9. Cicero S, Longo D, Rembouskos G, Sacchini C, Nicolaides KH. Absent nasal bone at 11-14 weeks of gestation and chromosomal defects. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003; 22: 31-5.
10. Cusick W, Provenzano J, Sullivan CA, Gallousis FM, Rodis JF. Fetal nasal bone length in euploid and aneuploid fetüses between 11 and 20 weeks' gestation: a prospective study. Ultrasound Med 2004; 23: 1327-33.
11. Larose C, Massoc P, Hillion Y, Bernard JP, Ville Y. Comparison of fetal nasal bone assessment by ultrasound at 11-14 weeks and by postmortem X-ray in trisomy 21: a prospective observational study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003; 22: 27-30.
12. Guis F, Ville Y, Vincent Y, Doumerc S, Pons JC, Frydman R. Ultrasound evaluation of the length of the fetal nasal bone throughout gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1995; 5: 304-7.
13. Benoit B, Chaoui R. Three-dimensional ultrasound with maximal mode rendering: a novel technique for the diagnosis of bilateral or unilateral absence or hypoplasia of nasal bones in second-trimester screening for Down syndrome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2005; 25: 19-24.
14. Cicero S, Longo D, Rembouskos G, Sacchini C, Nicolaides KH. Absent nasal bone at 11-14 weeks of gestation and chromosomal defects. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003; 22: 31-5.
15. Yayla M, Uysal E, Bayhan G, Yalınkaya A. Gebelikte nazal kemik gelişimi ve ultrasonografi ile değerlendirilmesi. Ultrasonografi Obstetrik ve Jinekoloji 2003; 7: 20-4.
File/Dsecription
Figure 1.
Nasal bone measurement.
Table 1.
Nasal bone length as to CRL in normal cases.
Diagram 1.
Change of nasal bone length as to CRL.
Diagram 2.
Change of nasal bone length as to BPD.
Diagram 3.
Change of nasal bone length as to HC.
Diagram 4.
Change of nasal bone length as to AC.
Diagram 5.
Change of nasal bone length as to FL.