Archive
Search

You can search published articles.

Journal Information

Online ISSN
1305-3124

Established
1993

Editors-in-Chief
​Cihat Şen, ​Nicola Volpe

Editors
Cecilia Villalain, Daniel Rolnik, M. Mar Gil

Managing Editors
Murat Yayla

Statistics Editor
Resul Arısoy

Relationship between umbilical artery Doppler investigations and perinatal outcome in patients with HELLP syndrome

Mehmet Okan Özkaya, Mekin Sezik, Hülya Toyran Sezik, Elif Gül Yapar, Hakan Kaya

Article info

Relationship between umbilical artery Doppler investigations and perinatal outcome in patients with HELLP syndrome. Perinatal Journal 2005;13(4):198-202

Author(s) Information

Mehmet Okan Özkaya1,
Mekin Sezik1,
Hülya Toyran Sezik2,
Elif Gül Yapar3,
Hakan Kaya2

  1. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Kadın Hastalıkları ve Doğum Anabilim Dalı- Isparta TR
  2. Isparta Doğumevi Hastanesi, Kadın Doğum- Isparta TR
  3. Zekai Tahir Burak Doğum ve Çocuk Hastanesi- Ankara TR
Publication History
Conflicts of Interest

No conflicts declared.

Objective 
To investigate the association between umbilical artery Doppler studies and subsequent perinatal mortality in pregnancies with HELLP syndrome.
Methods 
Seventy-seven women with HELLP syndrome were retrospectively evaluated regarding systole/diastole (S/D) ratios and presence of absent or reverse end-diastolic flow (AREDF) on umbilical artery Doppler velocimetry. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of S/D ≥5 and AREDF during umbilical artery doppler investigations for the prediction of perinatal mortality were calculated.
Results 
Cesarean section rate was 76% (n=57). Indications for cesarean delivery were obstetric causes in 6 women (10.5%) and fetal distress or HELLP syndrome in the remaining patients. Prenatal loss rate was 18% (n=14). There were 4 (6.3%) neonatal deaths out of 63 live-born infants. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of S/D ratio ≥5 on umbilical artery doppler velocimetry for predicting subsequent perinatal mortality was 85.7%, 66.7%, 36.3%, and 95.5%, respectively. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of the presence of AREDV on umbilical artery Doppler velocimetry for predicting subsequent perinatal mortality was 71.4%, 82.5%, 47.6%, and 92.8%, respectively.
Conclusions 
Umbilical artery Doppler investigations might be essential for evaluating the risk of perinatal mortality and timing of delivery in patients with HELLP syndrome. Normal umbilical blood flow in HELLP syndrome may demonstrate a low risk for perinatal mortality.
Keywords

HELLP syndrome, umbilical artery, Doppler investigations, perinatal mortality

Introduction
Preeclampsia is one of the most important complications of the pregnancy. Increase in the blood pressure and proteinuria in the preeclampsia is a rule.1 HELLP syndrome is a multi system illness with hemolysis, raised liver enzyme level and low thrombocyte count.2 HELLP syndrome is generally followed by preeclampsia and sometimes sporadic. Although define etiopathogenesis is not known, genetic closure, abnormal placentation, immunological pathologies and mother vascular endothelium dysfunction can play a role.3,4 It is known that HELLP syndrome has a relationship between raised perinatal mortality and fetal growth retardation (FBG).5
It is shown that in the examination of umbilical artery Doppler (UAD), in the case of the absent or reverse end-diastolic flow (AREDF) , some undesired consequences can happen such as intrauterine growth retardation or perinatal mortality.6,7 But there is not acidosis in all of the fetuses that AREDF is detected.8  Today, evaluation of umbilical blood stream plays an important role for the detection of feto-placental deficiency.9 Although there are some studies evaluating umbilical blood changes for pregnant with FBG and preeclampsia, this parameter is not studied efficiently for the patients with HELLP syndrome.
The objective of our study is to investigate the association between UAD investigation results and determinants of perinatal and postnatal period fetal well being.
Methods
77 patients with HELLP syndrome who hospitalized and cured in Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics of Isparta Süleyman Demirel University and Clinics Gynecology and Obstetrics of Maternity Hospital Isparta, and Ankara Zekai Tahir Burak Maternity and Children’s Hospital were investigated retrospectively. Some of the patients were affected by HELLP syndrome while they were monitored for preeclampsia or hypertension reasoning from pregnancy and some other patients were diagnosed as HELLP syndrome in their first time (AST≥ 70 U/L, thrombotic count < 150000/≥ and LHD > 150 U/L). All of the patients had the routine physical examination and obstetric ultrasonography, routine bio chemistry examinations, complete urine analysis, hemogram, hematocrit, thrombosis count examinations. UAD examinations were practiced by the same ultrasonography devices (Medison Sonace 8800 and Kretz Technic Combison 420) for the patients diagnosed HELLP syndrome or developed HELLP syndrome while their monitoring. In the Doppler examination, Sistol/Diastol (S/D) ratio and absent of diastolic flow (ADF) or reverse flow (RF) were searched. It was examined whether there was chronic hypertension or diabetes in anamnesis, abortion history and chronic illness in family history. Patients were closely monitored beginning from the time hospitalized to the time they were discharged from hospital after birth. Non-stress test (NST) results, intrauterine fetal loss and post partum fetal loss ratios, convulsion ratios were determined while the monitoring.
In UAD investigation, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPD) and negative predictive value (NPD) according to perinatal mortality of detected S/D ≥5 and AREDF were calculated. In addition, sensitivity, specificity, PPD and NPD in determining the probability of non-reactive NST for being S/D ≥5 in UAD investigation were calculated. Sensitivity, specificity, PPD and NPD for NST to determine perinatal mortality were determined. Student’s t-test was used for statistical analysis.
Results
Average age of the patients included in the study was 28.0≥ 6.5 years, gravida was 2.4≥1.8 and parity was 1.1 ≥1.4. Demographical characterizes of the patients and laboratory and Doppler results are shown in the Table 1.
For 14 of the total 77 patients (18%), intrauterine fetal loss was seen while monitoring. 38 of the patients (49.3%) of the patients had female fetus, 39 of the (50.3%) of the patients had male fetus. 7 patients (9%) were diagnosed eclampsia. When anamneses were examined, 10 of the patients (13%) had abortion history, 4 of the patients (5.2%) had chronic hypertension and 9 of the patients (11.7%) had hypertension history in the family. 50 patients (65%) in total were cured with antihypertensive treatment and magnesium sulfate treatment. 20 of the patients (26%) had vaginal delivery and the other had cesarean section. 6 of the patients (10.5%)  having cesarean section reasoned from obstetric inductions and the other from fetal distress and maternal factors of HELLP syndrome (thrombocytopenia, increase of hepatic enzyme). 9 of the patients (11.7%) gave the birth after the 36th pregnancy week, other infants (88.3%) were preterm delivery. 4 of the 63 live births (6.3%) were lost after postpartum period in the 2nd, 7th and 15th days.
Sensitivity, specificity, PPD and NPD to determine perinatal mortality in cases of UAD S/D ≥5 and non-reactive NST is given in the table 2. Sensitivity in determining the perinatal mortality for being UAD S/D ≥5 is 87.5%, specificity is 66.7%, PPD is 36.3% and NPD is 95.5 %, In case of AREDF in UAD investigation, sensitivity is 71.4 %, specificity is 82.5%, PPD is 47.6% and NPD is 92.8%. Sensitivity, specificity, PPD and NPD to determine probability of non-reactive NST is given in the Table 3.
Discussion
Doppler investigations are an important method to evaluate fetal well being in the intrauterine period.10 Abnormal Doppler results or AREDF detection is related with bad perinatal results.10 Perinatal mortality ratios reaching 80% was informed for AREDF developed cases.10 In the Doppler investigation in intrauterine period, besides umbilical artery, investigations of middle cerebral artery and uterine artery can also be made. In the studies of Lacin et al emphasized that UAD investigation results are better than middle cerebral artery in order to show perinatal results.11 Nevermore, it is stated that joint investigation of bilateral uterine artery, middle cerebral artery and umbilical artery is better for the estimation of the results of perinatal.12 Joern et al investigated parameters of umbilical artery and bilateral uterine artery Doppler for FBG and/or preeclampsia or HELLP syndrome patients in their studies.13 They detected that average birth week and birth weight decrease significantly with a Doppler distortion in one of these veins. In the same study, in the cases of Doppler distortion of double side uterine artery, 90% problem can develop for risky pregnancies, and this ratio is 72% for umbilical artery. Consequently, it is emphasized that investigation of bilateral uterine artery is an indispensable method to determine fetal risk.13
In our study, UAD results, perinatal results and NST were evaluated for the patients hospitalized for HELPP syndrome or developed HELLP syndrome while monitoring. We detected that AREDF detection in the UAD investigation or S/D ≥5 have high sensitivity and specificity in order to determine perinatal mortality.
Spirilla et al searched umbilical artery S/D ratio and short term neonatal complications and neurological developments for the first two years for 582 monomer pregnancies (between 24-35 weeks). 45.7% of the patients had also FBG diagnosis. In this group of patients, neonatal death or cerebral palsy (p: 0.001) was seen at the ratio of 3.4% when S/D ratio is below 95 percent, 4.9% when it is 95 percent and above and 17.3% when AREDF develops.7 In our study, 18% fetus of the mothers with HELLP syndrome is lost in intrauterine period. 10 of them (71.4%) had S/D ratio of ≥5.74% of the patients had cesarean section, 89.5% of these had cesarean induction reasoned from fetal distress or maternal problems from HELLP syndrome.
Venous Doppler investigations were done in the literature. Ductus venosus is one of the most used veins for that. For 35 patients that AREDF was detected in UAD, short term results of ductus venosus and effect to birth timing were investigated. Short term results (such as artery pH, intraventricular bleeding, and mortality) showed that evaluation of ductus venosus Doppler pulsality index is important. In the study, it is also important ductus venosus Doppler evaluation in order to determine fetal results and pregnancy timing for the pregnancies with AREDF in umbilical artery current.14
In the literature generally patients with preeclampsia or FBG are studied in arterial Doppler investigations.15,16 UAD examinations are not commonly used for the HELLP syndrome cased in order to evaluate perinatal results. High sensitivity (83%) and high specificity (80%) for the fetuses whose Doppler results is FBG to determine bad fetal condition is stated in the literature.17
In our study, fetal loss in intrauterine group with AREDF is 47.6% (10 of the total 21 patients); neonatal mortality is 18.2% (2 fetuses from total 21 patients). 12 of the fetuses in 32 patients with UAD S/D≥5 (37.5%) was lost in the intrauterine period, 3 of 20 live born fetuses (15%) was lost in the neonatal period. All of the 4 fetuses lost in the neonatal period were born in the 32nd pregnancy week. Similar to our study as in our study, for patients with AREDF in UAD investigation, high ratios of neonatal death was informed.16,18 In our study, prematurity should be effective for neonatal deaths, not the deficiency in Doppler examination. Indeed, AREDF detection in umbilical artery blood current may not have a separate effect on perinatal mortality after the chances such as FBG and premature is checked.19 The objective of the conservative approach to the cases with HELLP syndrome is to decrease perinatal mortality by gaining time with fetal maturation but in our study, 14 of the fetuses (18%) were lost during the conservative treatment. The reason for that can be the low pregnancy week of the cases and thus the insistence for continuing conservative treatment.  
In the literature, it is stated that UAD result are not efficient to determine fetal well being and the seriousness of the preeclampsia (thrill, hypertension level and other) but in the cases of deficient Doppler, ratio of FBG and cesarean increases.20,21
HELLP syndrome is an important obstetric problem that can cause bad results both for the mother and the infant. Umbilical artery S/D ratio is ≥5 for approximately half of the pregnancies with HELLP syndrome. When umbilical artery S/D ratio is ≥5, high sensitivity and NPD ratios are detected for the determination of perinatal mortality. When AREDF is monitored in UAD examination, high specificity and NPD ratios are detected for the determination of perinatal mortality. Pregnancies with pathologic UAD examinations, pregnancies result earlier.
Conclusion
When the risks of HELLP syndrome are considered for mother and infant, UAD investigation of these pregnancies are important both for the determination of perinatal mortality risk and the timing of birth. We believe that when not only the evaluation of umbilical artery but also bilateral uterine artery and middle cerebral Doppler evaluation is made, perinatal and postnatal mortality and morbidity can be better determined.
References
1. Davey DA, MacGillivray I. The classification and definition of the hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1988; 158: 892-8.
2. Martin JN Jr, Blake PG, Perry KG Jr, McCaul JF, HessLW, Martin RW. The natural history of HELLP syndrome: patterns of disease progression and regression. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991; 164: 1500-9.
3. Bussen S, Sutterlin M, Steck T. Plasma endothelin and big endothelin levels in women with severe preeclampsia or HELLP-syndrome. Arch Gynecol Obstet 1999; 262: 113-9.
4. Sezik M, Toyran H, Yapar EG. Distribution of ABO and Rh blood groups in patients with HELLP syndrome. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2002; 267: 33-6.
5. Sibai BM. The HELLP syndrome (hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelets): much ado about nothing? Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990; 162: 311-6.
6. Kaya F, Özcan T, Kaya N, Doğan MM, Danışman N, Gökmen O. Yüksek riskli gebelikte umbilikal doppler analiz sonuçları ile perinatal prognoz ilişkisi. T Klin Jin Obstet 1998; 8: 122-5.
7. Spinillo A, Montanari L, Bergante C, Gaia G, Chiara A, Fazzi E. Prognostic value of umbilical artery Doppler studies in unselected preterm deliveries. Obstet Gynecol 2005; 105: 613-20.
8. Nicolaides KH, Bilardo CM, Soothill PW, Campbell S. Absence of end diastolic frequencies in umbilical artery: a sign of fetal hypoxia and acidosis. BMJ 1988; 297: 1026-7.
9. Gagnon R, Van den Hof M; Diagnostic Imaging Committee, Executive and Council of the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada. The use of fetal Doppler in obstetrics. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2003; 25: 601-14.
10.Tannirandorn Y, Phaosavasdi S. Significance of an absent or reversed end-diastolic flow velocity in Doppler umbilical artery waveforms. J Med Assoc Thai 1994; 77: 81-6.
11. Laçin S, Demir N, Koyuncu F, Saygılı U, Göktay Y, Erten O. Predictivity of cerebral/umbilical artery Doppler ratio in severe preeclampsia. Gynecol Obstet Reprod Med 1998; 4: 17-20.
12. Joern H, Funk A, Rath W. Doppler sonographic findings for hypertension in pregnancy and HELLP syndrome. J Perinat Med 1999; 27: 388-94.
13.Joern H, Rath W. Comparison of Doppler sonographic examinations of the umbilical and uterine arteries in high-risk pregnancies. Fetal Diagn Ther 1998; 13: 150-3.
14. Muller T, Nanan R, Rehn M, Kristen P, Dietl J. Arterial and ductus venosus Doppler in fetuses with absent or reverse end-diastolic flow in the umbilical artery: correlation with short-term perinatal outcome. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2002; 81: 860-6.
15.Baschat AA, Gembruch U, Reiss I, Gortner L, Weiner CP, Harman CR. Relationship between arterial and venous Doppler and perinatal outcome in fetal growth restriction. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2000; 16: 407-13.
16.Soregaroli M, Bonera R, Danti L, Dinolfo D, Taddei F, Valcamonico A, et al. Prognostic role of umbilical artery Doppler velocimetry in growth-restricted fetuses. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2002; 11: 199-203.
17. Ertan AK, Wagner S, Hendrik HJ, Tanriverdi HA, Schmidt W. Clinical and biophysical aspects of HELLP-syndrome. J Perinat Med 2002; 30: 483-9.
18.Karsdorp VH, van Vugt JM, van Geijn HP, Kostense PJ, Arduini D, Montenegro N, et al. Clinical significance of absent or reversed end diastolic velocity waveforms in umbilical artery. Lancet 1994; 344: 1664-8.
19. Sezik M, Tuncay G, Yapar EG. Prediction of adverse neonatal outcomes in preeclampsia by absent or reversed end-diastolic flow velocity in the umbilical artery. Gynecol Obstet Invest 2004; 57: 109-13.
20.Todros T, Ronco G, Fianchino O, Rosso S, Gabrielli S, Valsecchi L, et al. Accuracy of the umbilical arteries Doppler flow velocity waveforms in detecting adverse perinatal outcomes in a high-risk population. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1996; 75: 113-9.
21. Bush KD, O'brien JM, Barton JR. The utility of umbilical artery Doppler investigation in women with the HELLP (hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelets) syndrome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001; 184: 1087-9.
File/Dsecription
Table .1
Demographical characteristics, laboratory and Doppler results of the patients.
Table 2.
Values for determining perinatal mortality in the study.
Table 3.
Values to determine non-reactive NST for being S/D ≥5 umbilical artery Doppler.