Archive
Search

In this section, you can search articles in the system.

Journal Information

Online ISSN (English)
1305-3124

Print ISSN (Turkish)
1300-5251

Online ISSN (Turkish)
1305-3132

Established
1993

Editor-in-Chief
Cihat Şen

Editors
Murat Yayla, Oluş Api

Neurofibromatosis type 1 case with cerebral involvement complicating pregnancy

Emre Zafer, Sündüz Özlem Altınkaya, Sümeyra Nergiz Avcıoğlu, Yasemin Durum, Mehmet Turgut

Article info

Neurofibromatosis type 1 case with cerebral involvement complicating pregnancy. Perinatal Journal 2016;24(1):41-46. DOI: 10.2399/prn.16.0241001

Author(s) Information

Emre Zafer1,
Sündüz Özlem Altınkaya1,
Sümeyra Nergiz Avcıoğlu1,
Yasemin Durum2,
Mehmet Turgut3

  1. Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Kadın Hastalıkları ve Doğum Anabilim Dalı, Aydın
  2. Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Radyoloji Anabilim Dalı, Aydın
  3. Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Beyin ve Sinir Cerrahisi Ana Bilim Dalı, Aydın
Correspondence

Emre Zafer, Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Kadın Hastalıkları ve Doğum Anabilim Dalı, Aydın, dr.emrezafer@gmail.com

Publication History

Manuscript Received: June 01, 2015

Manuscript Accepted: December 12, 2015

Earlyview Date: December 12, 2015

Publication date: April 23, 2016

Conflicts of Interest

Conflicts of Interest: No conflicts declared.

Objective
Neurofibromatosis-1 is a disease with an autosomal dominant inheritance pattern and heterogenous clinical presentation. Although it is not rare, its diagnosis may be overlooked except the cases evaluated by the specialists from related disciplines. In this report, we aimed to discuss the progress and complications of the disease during pregnancy over a case diagnosed with neurofibromatosis-1 during pregnancy.
Case(s)
Twenty-eight-year-old case who was pregnant for 30 weeks admitted with hypertension, proteinuria and convulsions. The patient delivered with the diagnosis of preeclampsia/eclampsia was established the diagnosis of neurofibromatosis-1 during postoperative period.
Conclusion
Neurofibromatosis-1 during pregnancy may cause serious problems with the rapid growth of neurofibromas, changing characteristics or the addition of new ones. To predict possible complications that may develop and to minimize them, neurofibromatosis-1 cases should be managed with an experienced and multidisciplinary team approach.
Keywords

Neurofibromatozis, pregnancy, preeclampsia.

Introduction
Neurofibromatosis-1 (NF-1) is an autosomal dominant disease presenting with cafe-au-lait spots, iris hamartomas and neurofibromas.[1] Diagnosis is established usually during adulthood. It is known that the prevalence, which is about 1:3000, does not change in pregnant population.[2]
It was claimed that some of the various complications, which are sometimes severe, seen in the pregnancies of women diagnosed with NF-1 were more frequent compared to the normal population.[3–6] In this report, we aim to review the progress and possible complications of NF-1 through our case.
Case Report
Our case who was twenty-eight years old and had the history of cesarean delivery was referred to our clinic due to convulsions and the loss of consciousness at 30 weeks of gestation. In the first examination, confusion, hypertension (160/80 mmHg) and tachycardia (155 beat/min) were noted. In the laboratory findings by hepatic function tests of the patient who was afebrile, it was found that thrombocyte count (170,000/dl) was normal, urea and creatinine values were within normal range but they were above the lower levels expected for pregnant women (38.7 mg/dl and 0.79 mg/dl, respectively). Also, +1 proteinuria and hemoconcentration (hemoglobin value, 14 g/dl) were noted. With preeclampsia-eclampsia pre-diagnosis, intravenous magnesium sulfate neuroprophylaxis protocol was applied to the patient with lethargy, hypertension and proteinuria. The patient found to have normal fetal heartbeat was taken to urgent cesarean delivery with previous cesarean indication. The female newborn whose birth weight was 2345 g, first-minute APGAR score was 5, five-minute score 8 was taken to intense care service for monitoring. During the cesarean delivery, common cafe-au-lait spots and lesions consistent with cutaneous neurofibromas were noted on the skin of patients. The consistency of findings with the diagnosis of neurofibromatosis-1 was confirmed by neurology specialist.
In the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of brain performed on the postoperative second day, 3.5¥2 cm FLAIR (fluid-attenuated inversion recovery) signal increase and edema were observed on the right cerebral peduncle anterior and right temporal lobe parahippocampal levels (Fig. 1). When choline (Cho) peak became clear in the MR spectroscopy of this area, it was considered that the decrease in the amount of N-acetyl aspartate (NAA) supported the neoplasia (Fig. 2).
When the records of the case for this pregnancy were reviewed, it was seen that her routine laboratory examinations were normal except high levels of free thyroid hormone and suppressed thyroid stimulating hormone levels (TSH 0.055 mIU/ml), and initiating treatment for them. In the family history, it was found out that her father and brother also had similar common spots (cafe-au-lait). Neurological and other clinical findings of patient were recovered during the follow-up in the intense care unit, and she was discharged on the postoperative fifth day with a non-complicated progress. Similarly, the newborn which had no problem during postpartum follow-up was discharged on 12th day.
In the follow-up MRI examinations carried out one and three months later, cystic changes and dimension increase (4.5¥3 cm) in the right parahippocampal lesion. The MR spectroscopy of the lesion with clear perfusion increase in the perfusion MRI supported the glial tumor possibility including malign degeneration (Figs. 3 and 4).
Discussion
Neurofibromatosis (NF-1) is an autosomal dominant disease developing with the mutation of NF1 gene which codes neurofibromin protein and standing out with cafe-au-lait spots, iris hamartomas and neurofibromas in clinical conditions.[1] Although it displays full penetrance, its clinical condition varies significantly among patients even among the family members. While it may progress with some cafe-au-lait spots in some individuals, it may have severe orthopedic and vascular findings in others. There is no evidence showing any impact on fertility, and it was reported that its incidence does not change during pregnancy.[2,4]
Our knowledge about the problems specific to the pregnancies of patients with NF-1 is based on some case series, a wide retrospective cohort study and other case reports reporting its rare complications.[7–11] Complications such as oligohydramnios, polyhydramnios, fetal growth retardation, intrauterine fetal death, gestational hypertension, preeclampsia, HELLP syndrome, chronic hypertension with superimposed preeclampsia, increased incidence of abortion and cesarean were reported during pregnancy, and it was claimed that some of them had higher rates compared to pregnant population without NF-1 diagnosis.[3–6] However, the claim of increased obstetric complications in some series was not supported.[12]
It was reported that neurofibromas grow during pregnancy and their numbers increase, and they decrease after delivery.[7,13] At this point, the impact of progesterone is focused due to the fact that a major part of neurofibromas (75%) express progesterone receptor.[14] The presence of mediastinal and abdominal tumors causing morbidities and even maternal and fetal losses with repeating or malign changes during pregnancy was reported.[15,16] Therefore, pregnant women established NF-1 diagnosis should be evaluated carefully in terms of neurofibromas and it should be kept in mind that the tumors in localizations not seen in the inspection in particular may develop complications secondary to pressure.[15]
Lesion similar to glial tumor was found in the right temporal lobe parahippocampal region and uncus during postpartum period in our case which did not have any neurological finding before pregnancy. It is reported that the neurofibromas with spinial localization may lead to severe morbidity during pregnancy and early postpartum period.[17] It was shown in MR studies that about 40% of patients with NF-1 which are mostly asymptomatic have spinal neurofibromas.[18,19]
Vascular anomalies such as aneurysm, arteriovenous malformation and stenosis are the most common reasons of death in NF-1.[20] Among them, renal artery stenosis may cause serious complications during pregnancy.[21] It was reported that pheochromocytomas progressing with hypertensive attacks are seen more frequently in NF-1.[22] Hemodynamic balances changing in normal pregnancy physiology require to be more careful about cardiovascular pathologies.
Severe hypertensive complications may develop in some patients except renal artery stenosis or pheochromocytoma etiology. While no increase in the incidence of hypertensive disease was shown in the series of eight cases by Segal et al., an increase was observed in the complications of gestational hypertension, preeclampsia, IUGR, preterm labor, cesarean delivery and cerebrovascular complications in a retrospective cohort study where antepartum, intrapartum and postpartum complications were investigated in 1500 NF-1 cases among about 20 million pregnant women.[4,23] Also, it was highlighted by analyses performed after the factors such as chronic hypertension, diabetes and renal diseases that the risk continues. Although rare maternal death cases secondary to the increased morbidity were reported in pregnant women with NF-1, it was stated that the mortality rates were not significantly different than the general population.[23]
Magnesium sulfate neuroprophylaxis protocol was initiated in our case with the diagnosis of preeclampsia-eclampsia based on convulsions, hypertension and proteinuria findings. While it can be considered that the convulsions depend on the effects of right temporal lobe tumor, they cannot explain proteinuria and hypertension.
The increase of cesarean rates is also a common problem seen in pregnant women with NF-1 frequently. Kyphoscoliosis, failed labor induction, hypertensive complications, cephalopelvic disproportion and non-indicated approaches are among the possible reasons.[2,7] In our case, preterm cesarean labor was preferred due to previous cesarean delivery.
Neuroaxial anesthesia procedure commonly required in the obstetric population is characterized in pregnant women with NF-1 diagnosis. Ruling out the involvement of central nervous system is of vital importance in terms of preventing a possible bleeding. Respiratory tracts should be evaluated carefully for neurofibromas, it should be prepared in advance for any emergency or planned intubation need.
Since complications associated with hypertension and the localization of neurofibromas in pregnancy with NF-1 are more common, directing precautions towards these areas would be reasonable. Identifying neurofibromas at significant anatomic localizations before or during early weeks of gestation which can be detected with simple imaging modalities is a significant step to prevent complications. Even asymptomatic, it should be kept in mind that spinal neurofibromas may grow rapidly during pregnancy. Questioning previous neurofibromas treated with medical or surgical methods is significant in terms of predicting recurrence or malign transformation.
Even though prognostic activity studies and cost analyses have not been performed yet, it may be required to rule out renal artery stenosis and pheochromocytoma in patients with suspicious history. Renal arteriography is indicated in cases found to have hypertension. In the increases of sudden blood pressure progressing with attacks such as sweating, palpitation and headache, it is required to investigate catecholamine in urine and other related metabolites.[21] In cases without previous hypertension, being cautious for preeclampsia which may develop based on cardiovascular complication risk may help to decrease morbidity rate. In our case, the tests required to rule out pheochromocytoma diagnosis could not be performed due to the shortness of postoperative hospitalization period and some social reasons; however, the patient was called for follow-up by informing in detail on this matter.
Conclusion
Skin examinations and investigating the family history of pregnant women in terms of cafe-au-lait spots and neurofibroma are significant for the diagnosis of NF-1. Eclampsia may accompany to NF-1 cases. However, other reasons such as pheochromocytoma and brain tumor should also be investigated in these cases. Therefore, interdisciplinary approach in the diagnosis and follow-up of NF-1 during pregnancy is important.
References
  1. DeBella K, Szudek J, Friedman JM. Use of the national institutes of health criteria for diagnosis of neurofibromatosis 1 in children. Pediatrics 2000;105:608–14. [PubMed
  2. Chetty SP, Shaffer BL, Norton ME. Management of pregnancy in women with genetic disorders: Part 2: Inborn errors of metabolism, cystic fibrosis, neurofibromatosis type 1, and Turner syndrome in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2011;66:765–76.  [PubMed] [CrossRef
  3. Weissman A, Jakobi P, Zaidise I, Drugan A. Neurofibromato-sis and pregnancy. An update. J Reprod Med 1993;38:890–6.  [PubMed
  4. Segal D, Holcberg G, Sapir O, Sheiner E, Mazor M, Katz M. Neurofibromatosis in pregnancy. Maternal and perinatal outcome. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1999;84:59–61.  [PubMed] [CrossRef
  5. iznitzer A, Katz M, Mazor M, Pinku A, Hagay ZJ. Neurofibromatosis in pregnancy. Four case reports and review of the literature. Isr J Med Sci 1986;22:579–81.  [PubMed
  6. Blickstein I, Lancet M. Fetal growth retardation as a complication of pregnancy in patients with neurofibromatosis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1987;157:343.  [PubMed
  7. Dugoff L, Sujansky E. Neurofibromatosis type 1 and pregnancy. Am J Med Genet 1996;66:7–10.  [PubMed] [CrossRef
  8. Cesaretti C, Melloni G, Quagliarini D, Fogliani R, Zaina B, Bedeschi MF, et al. Neurofibromatosis type 1 and pregnancy: maternal complications and attitudes about prenatal diagnosis. Am J Med Genet A 2013;161A:386–8. [PubMed] [CrossRef
  9. Baker VV, Hatch KD, Shingleton HM. Neurofibrosarcoma complicating pregnancy. Gynecol Oncol 1989;34:237–9. [PubMed] [CrossRef
  10. Agarwal U, Dahiya P, Sangwan K. Recent onset neurofibromatosis complicating eclampsia with maternal death: a case report. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2003;268:241–2. [PubMed] [CrossRef
  11. Hagymásy L, Tóth M, Szücs N, Rigó J Jr. Neurofibromatosis type 1 with pregnancy-associated renovascular hypertension and the syndrome of hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelets. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998;179:272–4. [PubMed
  12. Jarvis GJ, Crompton AC. Neurofibromatosis and pregnancy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1978;85:844–6. [PubMed] [CrossRef
  13. Anari AH, Nagamani M. Pregnancy and neurofibromatosis (von Recklinghausen’s disease). Obstet Gynecol 1976;47:25S– 29S. [PubMed
  14. McLaughlin ME, Jacks T. Progesterone receptor expression in neurofibromas. Cancer Res 2003;63:752–5. [PubMed
  15. Nelson DB, Greer L, Wendel G. Neurofibromatosis and pregnancy: a report of maternal cardiopulmonary compromise. Obstet Gynecol 2010;116 Suppl 2:507–9. [PubMed] [CrossRef
  16. Posma E, Aalbers R, Kurniawan YS, van Essen AJ, Peeters PM, van Loon AJ. Neurofibromatosis type I and pregnancy: a fatal attraction? Development of malignant schwannoma during pregnancy in a patient with neurofibromatosis type I. BJOG 2003;110:530–2. [PubMed] [CrossRef
  17. Dham BS, Kwa DM, Campellone JV. Postpartum paraparesis from spinal neurofibroma. Spine J 2012;12:e5–8. [PubMed] [CrossRef
  18. Egelhoff JC, Bates DJ, Ross JS, Rothner AD, Cohen BH. Spinal MR findings in neurofibromatosis types 1 and 2. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1992;13:1071–7. [PubMed
  19. Thakkar SD, Feigen U, Mautner VF. Spinal tumours in neurofibromatosis type 1: an MRI study of frequency, multiplicity and variety. Neuroradiology 1999;41:625–9. [PubMed] [CrossRef
  20. Oderich GS, Sullivan TM, Bower TC, Gloviczki P, Miller DV, Babovic-Vuksanovic D, et al. Vascular abnormalities in patients with neurofibromatosis syndrome type I: clinical spectrum, management, and results. J Vasc Surg 2007;46:475–84. [PubMed] [CrossRef
  21. Williams VC, Lucas J, Babcock MA, Gutmann DH, Korf B, Maria BL. Neurofibromatosis type 1 revisited. Pediatrics 2009;123:124–33. [PubMed] [CrossRef
  22. Terry AR, Barker FG 2nd, Leffert L, Bateman BT, Souter I, Plotkin SR. Neurofibromatosis type 1 and pregnancy complications: a population-based study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013;209:46.e1–8. [PubMed] [CrossRef
  23. Cecchi R, Frati P, Capri O, Cipolloni L. A rare case of sudden death due to hypotension during cesarean section in a woman suffering from pheochromocytoma and neurofibromatosis. J Forensic Sci 2013;58:1636–9. [PubMed] [CrossRef
File/Dsecription
Fig. 1.
Increase of right parahippocampal intensity in MR FLAIR and T2A views (arrow).
Fig. 2.
Distinctive choline peak supporting neoplasia in MR spectroscopy for lesion.
Fig. 3.
Distinctive perfusion increase indicating neoplasia in lesion region compared to normal side in perfusion MR examination (arrow).
Fig. 4.
Distinctive increase of choline peak in MR spectroscopy 3 months later, and increase of choline/NAA rate supporting neoplasia.