Archive
Search

In this section, you can search articles in the system.

Journal Information

Online ISSN (English)
1305-3124

Print ISSN (Turkish)
1300-5251

Online ISSN (Turkish)
1305-3132

Established
1993

Editor-in-Chief
Cihat Şen

Editors
Murat Yayla, Oluş Api

Evaluating 101 cases with the anomaly of fetal central nervous system

İlknur Gümüş, Atalay Ekin, Ceren Gölbaşı, Ezgi Hürcan, Cüneyt Eftal Taner

Article info

Evaluating 101 cases with the anomaly of fetal central nervous system. Perinatal Journal 2016;24(3):136-141 DOI: 10.2399/prn.16.0243003

Author(s) Information

İlknur Gümüş,
Atalay Ekin,
Ceren Gölbaşı,
Ezgi Hürcan,
Cüneyt Eftal Taner

  1. Tepecik Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi Kadın Hastalıkları ve Doğum Kliniği, İzmir
Correspondence

Atalay Ekin, Tepecik Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi Kadın Hastalıkları ve Doğum Kliniği, İzmir, atalayekin@hotmail.com

Publication History

Manuscript Received: August 16, 2016

Manuscript Accepted: September 22, 2016

Earlyview Date: September 22, 2016

Publication date: December 30, 2016

Conflicts of Interest

Conflicts of Interest: No conflicts declared.

Objective
We aimed to determine structural and chromosomal malformations in cases with the anomaly of fetal central nervous system and to evaluate the prognoses of these pregnancies.
Methods
Between 2010 and 2015, 101 cases found to have the anomaly of fetal nervous system were investigated retrospectively. Information such as maternal age, number of gestation, number abortion, week of gestation during diagnosis, anomalies found in ultrasonography, chromosome analysis results and council decision were evaluated.
Results
Cranial anomalies were found only in 26.7% of pregnancies while extracranial anomalies were found in 51.5% of them and abnormal karyotype was found in 11.9% of them. The most common anomaly of central nervous system was ventriculomegaly (51.5%). 68.3% of the pregnancies were terminated by council decision. Extremity anomalies were the most common type of extracranial anomalies (23.8%).
Conclusion
It is necessary to determine concurrent structural and chromosomal anomalies in order to determine prognoses and management of pregnancies with the anomaly of fetal central nervous system.
Keywords

Fetus, chromosomal anomaly, central nervous system, ventriculomegaly.

Introduction
Congenital anomalies affect approximately 2–3% of live births every year.[1] Central nervous system (CNS) anomalies account for about one third of congenital anomalies identified during perinatal period. CNS anomalies are the second most common severe congenital anomalies after cardiac anomalies. Therefore, investigating neurological system is a significant part of routine fetal anomaly screening today. CNS anomalies can be considered as the part of an isolated or systemic syndrome. In addition, structural and chromosomal anomalies may concur in many cases. Also, CNS anomalies are among the common reasons for medical attentions, long-term diseases and deaths. CNS anomalies are the reasons for 75% of fetal deaths and 40% of childhood deaths.[2]
Identifying any CNS anomaly during prenatal period is very important in terms of determining the possible reason, prognosis and management of the anomaly. Since mortality and morbidity rates are high in fetuses with severe CNS malformation, it is possible to offer the option of terminating pregnancy by informing family if diagnosis is established before viability limit. The aim of this study is to determine structural and chromosomal malformations in cases with the fetal CNS anomaly and to evaluate the prognoses of these pregnancies.
Methods
In this study, we retrospectively evaluated 101 cases found to have fetal CNS anomaly during fetal anomaly screening or routine obstetric ultrasonography (USG) between January 1, 2010 and December 31, 2015 at Gynecology and Obstetrics Clinic of Tepecik Training and Research Hospital. Approval of ethics committee required for the study was obtained from the Local Ethics Committee of Tepecik Training and Research Hospital with the number 29.07.2015/10. All cases were evaluated basically in terms of gestational prognosis and consistency of anomaly with life in the Perinatology Council participated by the specialists from the fields of Perinatology, gynecology and obstetrics, neurosurgery, pediatrics, pathology, genetics, pediatric surgery and radiology.
Information such as maternal age, number of gestation, number abortion, week of gestation during diagnosis, anomalies found in ultrasonography, chromosome analysis results and council decision were obtained from the medical records of patients. Infection parameters of all pregnant women were obtained since ultrasonographic cranial findings associated with intrauterine infections might develop. Patients suspected for intrauterine infection according to the examination results were excluded from the study.
Chorionic villus sampling, amniocentesis or cordocentesis was applied to entire study group for prenatal diagnosis purposes in accordance with the week of gestation. Before the procedure, each family to be done fetal karyotyping was informed in detail about genetic consultancy, methods of karyotyping procedure and complications. Fetal karyotyping procedure was carried out by obtaining informed consent. Chorionic villus sampling was applied to 16 cases at between 10 and 13 weeks of gestation, amniocentesis was applied to 68 cases at between 16 and 22 weeks of gestation, and cordocentesis was applied to 16 cases at between 20 and 28 weeks of gestation by experienced specialists.
The statistical analysis was performed by SPSS 15.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). In statistical analysis, categorical variables were presented as number (percentage) and continuous variables were presented as mean ± standard deviation in descriptive findings. In all analyses, statistically significant level was considered as p<0.05.
Results
The clinical characteristics of study group are shown in the Table 1. Maternal age was 28.1±6.2, gravida was 2.4±1.4, parity was 1.3±0.8, and abortion was 0.4±0.2. Mean week of gestation that fetal CNS anomaly was identified was 20.6±4.3. Of those, 5.9% were diagnosed at first trimester, 89.1% were at second trimester and 5% at third trimester. Cranial anomalies were found only in 26.7% of pregnancies with CNS anomaly while extracranial anomalies were found in 51.5% of them and abnormal karyotype was found in 11.9% of them. 68.3% of the pregnancies were terminated by council decision.
Structural and chromosomal malformations concurring with fetal CNS anomalies are presented in Table 2. After the evaluation, it was found that fifty-two fetuses had ventriculomegaly, 14 fetuses had anencephaly, 11 fetuses had encephalocele, 6 fetuses had holoprosencephaly, 8 fetuses had corpus callosum agenesis, 1 fetus had schizencephaly, 2 fetuses had intraventricular hemorrhage, 4 fetuses had cerebellar hypoplasia, 4 fetuses had Dandy-Walker malformation, 3 fetuses had vermian agenesis, 2 fetuses had Blake’s pouch cyst, 5 fetuses had mega cisterna magna, 2 fetuses had microcephaly, 3 fetuses had arachnoid cyst, 2 fetuses had cerebral cyst and 12 fetuses had choroid plexus cyst.
Concurrent extracranial anomalies are shown in Table 3. Extremity anomalies were the most common extracranial anomalies. Chromosomal anomaly was found in 12 cases. Of those, 8 patients had trisomy 18, 2 patients had trisomy 13, 1 patient had trisomy 22 and 1 patient 69XXX syndrome. Concurring cranial and extracranial anomalies in fetuses with chromosomal anomaly are shown in Table 4. While spinal defect was identified only in one case with chromosomal anomaly, multiple fetal anomalies developed in many systems were observed in other 11 cases. It was decided to terminate all these fetuses.
Discussion
Fetal CNS anomalies are severe pathologies seen in 1.4–1.6 of 1000 live births and accompanied with high morbidity.[3] In this study, we evaluated structural and chromosomal malformations in fetuses with CNS anomaly in a single center.
In a study performed between 2009 and 2011, 7485 pregnant women at over 10 weeks of gestation were examined by USG and malformations belonging to CNS were identified in 24 pregnant week. Mean diagnosis week is 23.4. Considering the distribution of diagnosis weeks to trimesters, it is seen that 1 case was diagnosed at first trimester, 12 cases were diagnosed at second trimester and 11 cases were diagnosed at third trimester. The authors associated the advanced diagnosis week with the low socioeconomic levels of patients and late application dates.[4] In our study, mean week of gestation for diagnosis of fetal CNS anomalies is lower (20.6). Similarly, fetuses diagnosed at third trimester were only 5% of the study group. This finding shows that the diagnosis of fetal CNS anomalies can be established at earlier weeks with technologic developments and wide use of four-dimensional USG. In another study performed on 69 pregnant women between 2007 and 2008, ventriculomegaly was the most common CNS anomaly (44.9%).[5] Onkar et al. found anencephaly as the most common fetal CNS anomaly.[4] However, ventriculomegaly cases were not included in the study as a separate group. Similarly, ventriculomegaly and anencephaly were the most common CNS anomalies in our study.
In previous studies, CNS malformations were determined as the most frequent reason for gestational termination. Wald et al. terminated 40 of 69 pregnancies with fetal CNS malformation.[6] In the same study, anencephaly was the reason in 25% of pregnancies terminated. Similarly, 68.3% of pregnancies with fetal CNS anomaly was decided to be terminated in our study. Termination due to poor fetal prognosis was offered to all pregnant women with fetal anencephaly, encephalocele, holoprosencephaly, schizencephaly, intraventricular hemorrhage and cerebellar hypoplasia. It was found that the rate of termination in pregnancies with fetal ventriculomegaly depends on the severity of ventriculomegaly. Accordingly, 39.2% of fetuses with mild ventriculomegaly, 39.2% of fetuses with moderate ventriculomegaly and 81.2% of fetuses with severe ventriculomegaly were terminated.
Usually, cranial malformation anencephaly is the case which can be detected the earliest sonographically. These anomalies are diagnosed frequently between 10 and 14 weeks of gestation. In the study of Kınay et al. performed to determine fetal anomaly incidence at 11–14 weeks of gestation, anencephaly was the most commonly identified anomaly.[7] There is an anencephaly case in the literature reported at 9 weeks by USG.[8] It is not recommended to establish sonographic diagnosis before 11–12 weeks since normal cranium ossification is observed at 13 weeks although there are cases reported at early weeks.[8,9] While the earliest diagnosis for anencephaly was established at 11 weeks of gestation in our study group, mean diagnosis week is 16.9. The diagnosis week for 32% of our cases was 11–14 weeks. The cases diagnosed at second and third trimesters are frequently the pregnant women at low socioeconomic levels referred to our clinic when they were diagnosed by chance at other centers.
In our study, microcephaly is the CNS anomaly which is diagnosed at the latest during antenatal period. Arachnoid cyst, corpus callosum agenesis and Blake’s pouch cyst are the following anomalies, respectively. These anomalies usually do not present any ultrasonic finding during early prenatal period depending on fetal development; however, they appear at late second trimester or third trimester. While termination could be decided for these cases by Perinatology Council when they are diagnosed at earlier weeks, follow-up was decided due to advanced week of gestation.
Many (51.5%) of the cases in our study group had concurrent multiple anomalies. Among the extracranial malformations, the most frequently identified ones were extremity anomalies. A possible reason for this relationship is the increase in the incidence of club foot secondary to neural tube defects. However, it is seen that anomalies may accompany in many other fetal systems. Therefore, fetuses with CNS anomaly should be examined in detail in the USG.
Ventriculomegaly is seen in 5–25/10,000 live births and 5–15% of the cases have aneuploidy. Kalaycı et al. found the abnormal chromosome rate as 4.9% in fetuses with ventriculomegaly.[10] While chromosomal anomaly rate was defined as 1.5–12% in isolated ventriculomegaly, this rate rises up to 9–36% when additional anomalies accompany to ventriculomegaly.[11,12] In our study, we observed chromosomal anomaly in 7.69% of 52 ventriculomegaly cases. We found abnormal karyotype in 10.7% of fetuses with mild ventriculomegaly. These rates show that there is a risk of chromosomal anomaly even slightly in ventriculomegaly, and fetal karyotyping procedure should be recommended to such cases.
Considering other cerebral anomalies, holoprosencephaly is seen in one per 10,000–15,000 births, but this rate is quite higher in fetal abortions (1/250). Chromosomal anomaly risk is very high in holoprosencephaly, and it was found associated with aneuploidy at a rate of 45%. It has particularly risk in terms of trisomy 13, trisomy 18 and triploidy.[13] In our study, we found chromosomal abnormalities in 50% of cases with holoprosencephaly. We found trisomy 13 in two cases and karyotype result of one case was consistent with trisomy 22. Corpus callosum agenesis was observed in 0.3–0.7% of general population and chromosomal anomaly risk is 20%. It is concurrent with trisomy 13, 18, deletions and duplications in particular. In our study, we found trisomy 18 in one of 8 cases (12.5%). Microcephaly is seen in one out of 6250–8500 live births and chromosomal anomaly risk is high.[14] There were two microcephaly cases in our study and karyotype results of both cases were normal. Chromosomal anomaly risk is about 2–3% in anencephaly cases with fatal progress; however, this rate may increase up to 11% in case of additional anomaly.[15] Chromosomal anomaly risk is 7–18% in encephalocele cases which are observed in one out of 3500–5000 live births. While the karyotype results of 14 anencephaly cases observed in our study were normal, we found triploidy in one of 11 encephalocele cases. Dandy-Walker malformation is found in one out of 25,000–30,000 live births and chromosomal anomaly risk is about 35%.[5,6] Güven et al. reported chromosomal anomaly in 3 (37.5%) out of 8 pregnant women found to have Dandy-Walker malformation.[16] In our study, we identified Dandy-Walker malformation in 4 cases and karyotype results of all fetuses were normal. Although incidence of mega cistern magna, cerebellar hypoplasia, intraventricular hemorrhage, vermian agenesis, arachnoid cyst and Blake’s pouch cyst is unknown, chromosomal anomaly risk is low in intraventricular hemorrhage, schizencephaly and Blake’s pouch cyst and the risk increases in these cases in the presence of additional anomalies.[5,6] In our study, we found trisomy 18 in a cerebellar hypoplasia case with multiple anomalies.
As known, choroid plexus cysts are specifically higher in fetuses with trisomy 18. While the incidence of these cysts is reported as 0.18–3.6% in the normal population, it is 25–70% in those with trisomy 18.[17] Thorpe-Beeston et al. reported that 34 of 83 cases with choroid plexus cyst had other structural anomalies and karyotyping was performed on all of them.[18] They found abnormal karyotype in 20 of 34 fetuses with additional anomaly. On the other hand, karyotype analysis was performed on 12 of 49 fetuses without additional anomaly according to USG and they were all evaluated as normal.[18] In the study of Nadel et al. including 234 pregnant women, the authors reported that 14 cases had structural anomalies which can be detected ultrasonographically, and they found trisomy 18 in the chromosome analysis of 11 cases and triploidy in one case.[19] They examined chromosomal structure of 62 out of remaining 220 fetuses and they found no anomaly in this group which was normal ultrasonographically.[19] In our study, we found chromosomal anomaly in 6 of 12 fetuses found to have choroid plexus cyst. However, all fetuses with chromosomal anomaly had additional structural anomalies. Therefore, it is necessary to perform a detailed ultrasonography to seek such anomalies in fetuses with choroid plexus cyst. In line with the previous literature, our findings show that the recommendation of fetal karyotyping procedure is necessary in the presence of concurrent anomalies in fetuses with choroid plexus cyst. Karyotyping on cases with isolated choroid plexus is not a routine procedure at our clinic. However, our study shows that fetal karyotyping is performed due to advanced maternal age or increase of risk in screening test although there is no additional anomaly in fetuses with choroid plexus cyst. Therefore, fetal karyotyping is not a recommended procedure if there is no anomaly or other indications accompanying to isolated choroid plexus cases.
Conclusion
Consequently, some anomalies such as microcephaly can appear at late periods of pregnancy although many fetal CNS anomaly can be identified at second trimester screening USG. Therefore, it would be beneficial to re-evaluate cranial anatomy at third trimester USG. On the other hand, concurrent structural and chromosomal anomalies should be determined in order to identify prognoses and management of pregnancies with the anomaly of fetal central nervous system. Thus, detailed USG procedure and karyotype analysis are necessary in pregnancies found to have fetal CNS anomaly. Since CNS anomalies have severe morbidity and mortality, it should be considered to offer gestational termination to families as an option.
References
  1. Whiteman VE, Reece EA. Prenatal diagnosis of major congenital malformations. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 1994;6: 459–67. [PubMed

  2. Adama van Scheltema PN, Nagel HT, Brouwer OF, Vandenbussche FP. Outcome of children with prenatally diagnosed central nervous system malformations. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003;21:41–7. [PubMed] [CrossRef

  3. Ghavami M, Abedinzadeh R. Prevalence of perinatal central nervous system anomalies in East Azarbaijan-Iran. Iran J Radiol 2011;8:79–81. [PubMed

  4. Onkar D, Onkar P, Mitra K. Evaluation of fetal central nervous system anomalies by ultrasound and its anatomical co-relation. J Clin Diagn Res 2014;8:AC05–7. [PubMed] [CrossRef

  5. Ozkan ZS, Gilgin H, Aygün HB, Deveci D, Simşek M, Kumru S, et al. Our clinical experience about prenatal diagnosis and neonatal outcomes of fetal central nervous system anomalies. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2011;24:502–5. [PubMed] [CrossRef

  6. Wald M, Lawrenz K, Deutinger J, Weninger M. Verification of anomalies of the central nervous system detected by prenatal ultrasound. Ultraschall Med 2004;25:214–7. [PubMed] [CrossRef

  7. Kınay T, Kaplan M, Altay MM, Özdemirci Ş, Karadeniz S, Erol AO. Results of fetal anomaly screening performed at 11-14 weeks of gestation at a tertiary center. Perinatal Journal 2016;24:100–5. [CrossRef

  8. Becker R, Mende B, Stiemer B, Entezami M. Sonographic markers of exencephaly at 9 + 3 weeks of gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2000;16:582–4. [PubMed] [CrossRef

  9. Sepulveda W, Sebire NJ, Fung TY, Pipi E, Nicolaides KH. Crown-chin length in normal and anencephalic fetuses at 10 to 14 weeks’ gestation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997;176:852–5. [PubMed] [CrossRef

  10. Kalaycı H, Özdemir H, Gülümser Ç, Parlakgümüş A, Çok T, Tarım E, et al. Ultrasonographic evaluation of ventriculomegaly cases. Perinatal Journal 2015;23:1–5. [CrossRef

  11. Weichert J, Hartge D, Krapp M, Germer U, Gembruch U, Axt-Fliedner R. Prevalence, characteristics and perinatal outcome of fetal ventriculomegaly in 29,000 pregnancies followed at a single institution. Fetal Diagn Ther 2010;27:142–8. [PubMed] [CrossRef

  12. Gaglioti P, Danelon D, Bontempo S, Mombro M, Cardaropoli S, Todros T. Fetal cerebral ventriculomegaly: outcome in 176 cases. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2005;25:372–7. [PubMed] [CrossRef

  13. Hayashi Y, Suzumori N, Sugiura T, Sugiura-Ogasawara M. Prenatal findings of holoprosencephaly. Congenit Anom (Kyoto) 2015;55:161–3. [PubMed] [CrossRef

  14. Dahlgren L, Wilson RD. Prenatally diagnosed microcephaly: a review of etiologies. Fetal Diagn Ther 2001;16:323–6. [PubMed] [CrossRef

  15. Yazici LE, Malatyalioglu E, Sakinci M, Tosun M, Bildircin FD, Ogur G, et al. Chromosomal anomalies and additional sonographic findings in fetuses with open neural tube defects. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2012;286:1393–8. [PubMed] [CrossRef

  16. Güven MA, Ceylaner S, Ceylaner G. Dandy Walker malformation and variation: prenatal ultrasonographic features and clinical outcome. [Article in Turkish] Perinatoloji Dergisi 2004;12:173–8.

  17. Benacerraf BR, Harlow B, Frigoletto FD Jr. Are choroid plexus cysts an indication for second trimester amniocentesis? Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990;162:11–6. [PubMed] [CrossRef

  18. Thorpe-Beeston JG, Gosden CM, Nicolaides KH. Choroid plexus cysts and chrosomal defects. Br J Radiol 1990;63:783–6. [PubMed] [CrossRef

  19. Nadel AS, Bromley BS, Frigoletto FD Jr, Estroff JA, Benacerraf BR. Isolated choroid plexus cysts in the second-trimester fetus: is amniocentesis really indicated? Radiology 1992;185:545–8. [PubMed] [CrossRef
File/Dsecription
Table 1.
Clinical characteristics of the pregnant women in the study group.*
Table 2.
Perinatal outcomes of fetal CNS anomalies.
Table 3.
Extracranial anomalies accompanying to fetal CNS anomalies.
Table 4.
Clinical characteristics and concurrent anomalies of fetuses with chromosomal anomaly.